Retailer Approach to the market.

GladiatorX

Established member
Messages
905
Likes
119
This post is for people who are struggling with their trading, not being profitable and finding themselves working extremely hard to no effect.
A recent post 'Who uses stop losses?' and the various replies about how they are neccesary, proffesional, business-like. What i realised from this, mostly, is that the retail crowd is conditioned to act like a flock of sheep. Books and information avaliable to those not in the direct trading arena, tell the same stuff about money management, tell you your stupid to average down, use stop losses, risk 1% of your account, and other common propaganda ;)
The interesting thing i've realised about such comments, is that the individuals who say them, have got them from a different book - Its a never ending cycle. To my belief, those that write books, detailing and explaining how retail traders should trade, aren't particularly good traders themeselves - And i don't want to see facts from their trading statements to prove me wrong. The reason i believe this is due a solid believe i've always had in respect to the market, you must embrace uncertainty. Those that write books, make seminars, are just trying to find certainty due to their own inability to trust their own trading.
Thats fine with me, but what i've noticed is that these common ideologies are regarded as trading wisdom among the trading community. I was feed all this when i was learning to trade, an important man told me when i was learning that 95% of traders fail and therefore you shouldn't listen to them and you should try to think outside of the box. In my own trading, this has most certainly been applied since day one to the extent that i spent a period of time fading Money Weeks suggestions and it worked. I've always tried to think in a unique and different way to other, common, public traders and through doing that i've made myself succesful.
Replicated all over the internet is losing traders with the following beliefs
- High probability + Discpline = Success
- Must use stop loss and have a designated, already planned risk:reward ratio, know exactly what risk is in a particular trade

This is all understandable and the reason the public sticks so firm to these rules is it adds certainty to the market place, you know your risk, and thats it. There is no chance of becomming emotional when your brokerage account goes bust and you feel major anxiety as you try to explain to your friends that its still a worthwhile pursuit to continue....

In the market, certainty doesn't exist, any rule that tells you otherwise exists from the major belief of the public and retail traders.

When i was learning, the fact 95% lose was a very solid fact in my mind... Everything i read from traders who were losers i would make the opposite a firm belief. Although admittedly i went through a phase of having a set risk:reward ratio (1:2) and risking 1% of my account, thus calculating my position size must be (x). My stop loss was frequently hit and i wasn't surprised, after all, i cannot predict the future price direction, i can only guess and maybe through experience have a higher probability of being right. But ofcourse my stop loss is getting hit.
1. I'm buying High, i'm buying on a higher close, buying in a late signaled uptrend rather than buying on falling price.
That was my first realization.
My second was that, ofcourse my stop loss is getting hit...
2. Price is volatile, its not about being able to expertly forecast price direction with the precision to be able to place a 5 pip stop loss, its about watching the market dance, letting it move, up and down and just trying to take a piece, without trying to be right.

Using a stop loss therefore in my mind became 'trying to be right', i would go long, set a stop loss because i'm confident i can forecast that prices will move higher and if they don't i'll exit because i was wrong...

I tried to move away from this idea and explore how i could trade without being right... Without a stop loss. I had printed off all my trades i ever did and analysised them in detail trying to find what went wrong and they were my findings, one i was buying on an upbar, two i was going long because for whatever reason, i believed price would go higher and therefore i set a close stop loss.

My stop loss would get hit time and time again, and thats not a problem its fair enough, i'm sure individuals use stop losses and have a 1:2 risk reward ratio and have a 66% probability of being correct and therefore through calculation they will be succesful over x number of trades... But personally i saw trading as more of an art, than certain maths, and more about movement than predicting price direction. I believe what i have described is a common reason traders fail.
They all have a set ideology that if they pursue a high probability strategy and use discpline, they will be succesful, that its stupid to have a risk:reward ratio of less than 1:1, that its stupid to aim for very high win percentages, that entering price is the most important detail.

I hope through reading that, some of you come to a realization about your own trading career thus far, is trading really about having a certain risk:reward, applying the same risk to every opportunity, exiting at a pre-determined level with no further analysis after initiating a trade...

Those on the forums that are succesful, it is likely that they do use such a strategy or methodology, that small percent, and the rest thing if only they could they could join that few percent. But the thing is, this forum is full of retail traders, so ofcourse the lucky few who make a living from such strategies use these ideologies, because 'its common wisedom'... Its extremely hard and thats why only 5% can, but if everyone just looked past such wisedom you can see trading doesn't have to be so complicated and time-consuming, volatility is enough to make profits without being a prophet or able to interpret a maze ball.... All the prop firm traders that are succesful that i have been lucky enough to meet, all the books i have read that are genuinely created by proffesional traders, all the experience of successes i have had from trading all come from this same ideology and methodology i am trying (and maybe failing) to display coherently...

Proffesional traders trust their thoughts and analysis in entering and exiting, and i understand that people keep telling you that succesful traders have a SYSTEM, they follow with GREAT discpline and MONEY MANAGEMENT... The people replicating this are just speaking to themeselves, telling themeselves one day they will make it if they stick to them rules... I can tell you, proffesional traders win through their own judgement and experience and volatility... Not hard backtested strategies.

Dinos may disagree but he is an exception and argueably, having been trading 10 years, through following such difficult wisedom has made the entire trading difficult for himself, despite succesful and probably not AS succesful as he would be had he not following such a route. But as no1 says 'There are many ways to skin a cat' 'But only one way to do it properly'... And i believe that you shouldn't follow the flock.

So how can you change your current quest to trade for a living?
1. Read my previous post about how to learn to trade, i seriously think if traders learn to read the markets, they will be succesful, even if by 'reading' i mean interpreting the market to their own beliefs about the market from personal research... doesn't have to be correct. Read it, take it in.
2. Try to escape common wisedom and general public beliefs. Start thinking outside the box, stop researching stochastics no matter how many times you've heard 'Many ways to skin a cat' and start looking into volatility, high win percents and try get past your human instincts and don't use hard stops, or atleast never let them get hit.
3. Average down and pyramid with risk management.
4. Enter when price is falling.... In an uptrend.

I strongly believe averaging down, as long as it isn't done due to fear or because you are losing (If done as a planned strategy) is an easy way to profit... That is from personal experience and it is expressed in my account balance.

I will try update this a bit more later, try make it a better article, less waffling.

Thanks for reading.

Gladiator X Glad to help.
 
i do think stops are more necessary in swing trading though, not for scalping . lol what do i know anyway...
 
But not using stops and adding to losing trades is nothing new/different either, is it?
I mean, probably 99% of people who start trading and losing think, "hmmm.....my stops keep getting hit. I know!....I wont use stops anymore!"
 
i think the main point isn't to stop using stops because they keep stopping you out, but to stop following the crowd's herd like trading methods
 
But not using stops and adding to losing trades is nothing new/different either, is it?
I mean, probably 99% of people who start trading and losing think, "hmmm.....my stops keep getting hit. I know!....I wont use stops anymore!"
I'm not saying don't use stop losses... I'm saying get away from herd mentality, which is usually to have a 1:3 risk reward ratio, system and discpline...

People that stop using stops through fear that they keep getting hit, are just doing fear-based trading. That is not what i mean.

Personally i do have Hard stops on my trades, insurances - I never let them get hit, the way i derive these hard stops is my maximum loss for the day...
The most i am willing to lose on any given day is 4% of my account, i cannot exceed this, that is my daily limit. That is how i manage my risk while allowing volatility to earn my money...

Individuals who average-down because they are scared of losing, are losers... I am saying that if you plan and use it tactically, it is a very useful tool often over-looked through bad 'press' from retail traders... And as someone who is part of the 5% of winners, and who knows lots of other +5% traders, i am telling you as individuals that i think you need to approach trading in a different manor and start opening your ideas to other methods of trading.

If you trade yourself succesfully with 1:3 risk reward and a 20-pip (always 20 pip) stop loss then congratulations... I'm just passing the wisedom that i have learnt on. I'm an individual who has made money since his 4th month of starting to learn to trade, i don't have losing months and i'm not particularly smart, i'm trying to explain why and how.

I don't add to losing trades. Thats not what averaging down is - Thats just your common, pre-conceptualised imagine, hypothetically injected into your mind through authors whos agenda is confluence with readers. If price is in an uptrend and i believe it to be oversold, i will buy, if it continues to fall, which is totally planned by me, this is what i want to happen, then i will keep adding to my position until i win -

The way that i reduce risk is through opening an initial position @ 10% of my planned position... So for example if i won't to get long a stock 1000 shares... I will buy 100 first, if price continues to form and price action looks like a pullback/retracement rather than reversal, i will continue to add to that position until i am 100% in, then i have a maximum loss that i can endure, which at the very worst, and this has never happened would be 5% of my account...

Averaging down with calculated risk... Its extremely high probability of success. I don't enter a trade, find i'm losing and add more. Its all planned and calculated and it makes me win every trade/most trades...

I'm trying to give people a view of a more proffesional mindset that is common to these forums, i don't consider myself a master of trading, far from it, but i believe my insights could help a lot of traders who are stuck in a rut.

I hope that helps.

I will try to soon write an indepth article about how to average down without incurring any major risks to your account - It is extremely succesful... I understand that one day you'd expect an individual to blow their account through such a methodology but the way i do it reduces such risk and turns it into something that considers risk and has a high win percent, then if an individual can improve their entries and improve pyramidding they can enjoy a very relaxed, emotionless free way of trading that slowly builds high probability positions into stocks... I also day-trade such methods too, using different times throughout the day to add to my positions.

During the recent bear market i was profitable on my long positions using the above half explained methodology, their is nothing to discredit it :)
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying don't use stop losses... I'm saying get away from herd mentality, which is usually to have a 1:3 risk reward ratio, system and discpline...

People that stop using stops through fear that they keep getting hit, are just doing fear-based trading. That is not what i mean.

Personally i do have Hard stops on my trades, insurances - I never let them get hit, the way i derive these hard stops is my maximum loss for the day...
The most i am willing to lose on any given day is 4% of my account, i cannot exceed this, that is my daily limit. That is how i manage my risk while allowing volatility to earn my money...

Individuals who average-down because they are scared of losing, are losers... I am saying that if you plan and use it tactically, it is a very useful tool often over-looked through bad 'press' from retail traders... And as someone who is part of the 5% of winners, and who knows lots of other +5% traders, i am telling you as individuals that i think you need to approach trading in a different manor and start opening your ideas to other methods of trading.

If you trade yourself succesfully with 1:3 risk reward and a 20-pip (always 20 pip) stop loss then congratulations... I'm just passing the wisedom that i have learnt on. I'm an individual who has made money since his 4th month of starting to learn to trade, i don't have losing months and i'm not particularly smart, i'm trying to explain why and how.

I don't add to losing trades. Thats not what averaging down is - Thats just your common, pre-conceptualised imagine, hypothetically injected into your mind through authors whos agenda is confluence with readers. If price is in an uptrend and i believe it to be oversold, i will buy, if it continues to fall, which is totally planned by me, this is what i want to happen, then i will keep adding to my position until i win -

The way that i reduce risk is through opening an initial position @ 10% of my planned position... So for example if i won't to get long a stock 1000 shares... I will buy 100 first, if price continues to form and price action looks like a pullback/retracement rather than reversal, i will continue to add to that position until i am 100% in, then i have a maximum loss that i can endure, which at the very worst, and this has never happened would be 5% of my account...

Averaging down with calculated risk... Its extremely high probability of success. I don't enter a trade, find i'm losing and add more. Its all planned and calculated and it makes me win every trade/most trades...

I'm trying to give people a view of a more proffesional mindset that is common to these forums, i don't consider myself a master of trading, far from it, but i believe my insights could help a lot of traders who are stuck in a rut.

I hope that helps.

I will try to soon write an indepth article about how to average down without incurring any major risks to your account - It is extremely succesful... I understand that one day you'd expect an individual to blow their account through such a methodology but the way i do it reduces such risk and turns it into something that considers risk and has a high win percent, then if an individual can improve their entries and improve pyramidding they can enjoy a very relaxed, emotionless free way of trading that slowly builds high probability positions into stocks... I also day-trade such methods too, using different times throughout the day to add to my positions.

During the recent bear market i was profitable on my long positions using the above half explained methodology, their is nothing to discredit it :)

Gladiator's approach is really refreshing - and all credit to him for having the ball$ and decency to publish it. I hope it makes people think. I think one of his most important points is that it's no good persevering with systems / tactics / strategies / text book procedures / herd mentality if it doesn't work for you. But you've got to start somewhere and the foregoing is probably as good as any; when I began to realise I was part of the 95% I decided to do something about it and that was when things started to get better.

Sir Isaac Newton sussed it out way back in the 17th Century (Newton's First Law states that an object at rest tends to stay at rest and that an object in uniform motion tends to stay in uniform motion unless acted upon by a net external force.) This applies to traders as much as anything else when their state of rest or uniform motion is getting them nowhere.

Good stuff Gladiator.
 
Having thought about it a bit more and agreeing that Gladiator's approach is good, I do believe that his "professional" approach is beyond the grasp of many beginners until they have been through the mill of all the stuff that often doesn't work - and convinced themselves that they have to raise their game. You have to have been part of the 95% to really appreciate what he's talking about.

It's a bit like training people to fly - even the best pilots eg Neil Armstrong, started off in puddle jumpers and couldn't have handled a sophisticated plane at the start. Why should trading be different?
 
Gladiator I didn't think I would ever come across anyone who could write longer posts than BSD - but you getting there !!

Being serious, I trade for a living and agree with most of what said above. I don't believe in Rsi, MA's etc just trade what you see not what has happened. Stops are vital though even if is just because the pc crashes. I always have a stop in place - don't always stick to it - but it's there. Never add to losing trades.

Can't wait for the in depth article - have to take a day off to read it !!

Good posts - have a good day.
 
i'm confused. do you read books or don't you? how would you describe the writers of the books you do read? averaging down without a stop loss - is this a recommendation for newbies? mmmmmnnnn, interesting. might work in trading range, but what if there was a strong trend going against you? do you have experience of this or are you also one of those people who writes about things they don't do (assuming this post is even original)? sounds plain crazy. quick example:
if you buy a stock at €1100 and it goes down to €1090, you buy more? then if it goes to €1080, you buy more? then €1070, so you buy more? and so on? already that's €30 loss on lot1, €20 loss on lot2, €10 loss on lot3 and lot4 is resting even. so you're down €60 when you buy lot4 and you still not sure when or if the price will reverse before your margin call (or even this year). on the other hand a 10 point hard stop would have guaranteed you a €10 loss, but at least you'd then be out and waiting for a better entry when the price showed reversal. sure, if the price did reverse you could make good returns, but you could also blow your account on just one averaged down trade. it's gambling.
 
Last edited:
might work in trading range, but what if there was a strong trend going against you?

There was no implication of counter trend trading in fact quite the opposite from what I have read. Also the approach is one of scaling in as the market retraces from the direction of the trend. So a full position will only happen if the market retraces by a certain amount. You would not just continue to add to positions if the market continued to go against you. Another consideration is the timeframe being traded as that will have a big impact on what is a retracement relative to trend.


Paul
 
There was no implication of counter trend trading in fact quite the opposite from what I have read. Also the approach is one of scaling in as the market retraces from the direction of the trend. So a full position will only happen if the market retraces by a certain amount. You would not just continue to add to positions if the market continued to go against you. Another consideration is the timeframe being traded as that will have a big impact on what is a retracement relative to trend.


Paul

i understand what you're saying and that makes sense - buying retracements in an uptrend. but the OP used the term 'averaging down' which is essentially adding to a losing position (that might have started going against you) in the hope it will return which is a high-risk strategy and is also gambling terminology. if you're buying retracements in an uptrend you should already be in profit anyways, so no need to 'average down'. what you're doing then is adding to the position or 'averaging up' if you will - yeah, like you said scaling in, but that's not what OP said. my point is that what professional traders at firms can do and what private traders can do are different - capital allocation and trade management is different for both. prof traders don't need to use hard stops because someone else will blow the whistle and call time out on their trading - but a private (home) trader doesn't have that.
 
Last edited:
I strongly believe averaging down, as long as it isn't done due to fear or because you are losing (If done as a planned strategy) is an easy way to profit... That is from personal experience and it is expressed in my account balance.
If your basis for taking a directional bias includes the facility for averaging down in certain circumstances and all is clearly anticipated and prepared beforehand - then all well and good. But you're still trading with a stop. You've mentioned elsewhere.

That you don't have a specific stop level for the trade you're in and would prefer to wait for your account to bleed 4% before calling it a day, is just another stop.

It's not for me to critique your approach (which is very similar to Du Toit's) as although I have tried it in the past, I did find that the 80% of the time the price does come back is never fully compensated for by the 20% of the time it doesn't – and you find you did have a stop after all.

Averaging down albeit with predetermined criteria and graduated scale-ins and all those other good things that make you think you’re being really professional (the pros are laughing) are just a smokescreen for poor market timing.

Your approach will appeal to the many that find timing an issue and have their stops hit more frequently than their targets. Which is why it is all the more dangerous for them on the one hand, and humane on the other.

Good luck to you and all those who follow you over the edge…
 
This averaging down looks like a good idea on paper but you are quite right, you are just lowering your stop. If the market is going against you, the first stop is sufficient, otherwise you are trading against the trend. Far better to close, trade in the other direction or step aside.
 
Top