barjon said:jilly
Not quite sure what's going on here, nor the relevance of "50% sector average".
Are they trying to claculate a forward PE using average prospective earnings growth of the sector as a whole or what? As far as I know a PE ratio (if you're meaning Price/Earnings) does not "value" a company - it merely divides earnings per share into the current price.
I suppose you could say that a company with below average PE compared to the sector is "good value" but only if its earnings were expected to match the sector average. Certainly its earnings do not relate directly to its bank balance and assets etc so it's not relevant to use a PE ratio for that sort of valuation.
Or have I misunderstood?
jon
Tuffty said:"Mech/Elec & Heat/vent contractor"
Just a thought.....
Is Engineering the correct sector? If they make are a service company then maybe they could be classified under "Support Services", or under 'Construction' if they mainly install into new builds.
JillyB said:Good point Tuffty,
I think I will look into this more. Thanks for your help.
the blades said:Eyup Jilly,
I've attached some data from sharescope for the sector/ Hope this helps.
UTB
JillyB said:(And from Yorkshire too!
marben said:Hi Jill,
FWIW Hemscott gives the forward P/E for the engineering & machinery sector as 12.79.
Jon, I think I understand what the accountants are driving at: earnings x P/E * 50% = value for private company.
HTH,
Mark