Merill Lynch trader

its not gone un-detected, thats why they are investigating it


It has gone undetected... or should I say they have a flaw in their system that allows 1broker to accumulate such loss... One trader. It was not detected @250,000. In this economic climate you would have thought their risk should be reduced shouldn't it?
 
They have product controllers on hand verifying and controlling that the P/L and risk are with in the traders or desks remit. This is middle office and liases with both front and back office functions. Take Mr Leeson, he had some knowledge of the back and middle office and was able to conceal losses in a temporary holding account. The trader is not the one to blame. The bank's control system suffered systematic failure. Had the correct processes and procedures been followed then the trader would have been repremanded before incuring such losses. On the other hand someone may have turned a blind eye.

Either way they cocked up!
 
Top