Esocs
During the credit crunch, when rates were being slashed, I got the impression that rates were going to be cut regardless of where inflation was. I realise that the bank may have acted strictly speaking within the mandate, but I'm sure it wouldn't be too difficult to manipulate the inflation model du jour to ensure "falling inflation expectations" and justify rate cuts. I am reading between the lines, but I thought it was odd that during the crisis, the governor was still writing an apology letter to the chancellor when it was clearly expedient to cut rates. If (i) inflation is where it is now, and (ii) the mandate is to control inflation, shouldn't rates be raised now? I don't see it in the near term. I may be oversimplifying, but to me, the inflation mandate is taking a back seat. So, I would ask if the mandate has been compromised.