I don't care !!!

I started viewing the video but decided I just don't care :LOL:

haha, I like the "feebo-na-CHEE" level (y)

Peter
 
wackypete2 said:
I started viewing the video but decided I just don't care :LOL:

haha, I like the "feebo-na-CHEE" level (y)

Peter
Click to expand...

I was going to post on some threads that were talking about signal providers but I just don't care anymore :sleep:

;)
 
Funny thing is all those "indicators" he was spilling don't *%&#^%* matter. Smoke-in-mirrors hoax, they are, to get all of us looking at the wrong things.
 
michael922 said:
Funny thing is all those "indicators" he was spilling don't *%&#^%* matter. Smoke-in-mirrors hoax, they are, to get all of us looking at the wrong things.
Click to expand...

OK, I'll bite...which indicators really do *%&#^%* matter?
Do you use them in your trading system you are selling?

Peter
 
michael922 said:
Funny thing is all those "indicators" he was spilling don't *%&#^%* matter. Smoke-in-mirrors hoax, they are, to get all of us looking at the wrong things.
Click to expand...

I was going to reply but fatigue has set in so I can't be arsed anymore:sleep:
 
Oh, a free invitation for my pitch? Why hide it? Here we go! It's the Super-Duper Bull$&!*-o-Meter!

"The body is three-quarters of the length of the candle" ... Ha! are you kidding me? That's subjective, unscientific garbage - at least to me - because it doesn't seem to be based on rational hypothesis/es. In other words, it only equates correlation with cause, but don't we all know the reality of the relationship between the two? OK, OK, there might be some merit to some of those indicators and they all just might work for you (they HAVE to work a little bit, otherwise no one would... how do you say? ... bite), and while correlation might not constitute cause I will admit that doesn't mean the correlation is irrelevant, but they *all* require subjective judgement (i.e. inform a "decision to trade" rather than a "signal to trade" and if you DO use it as a "signal", kiss yo' money bye-bye) and/or need "affirmation" of (maybe half a dozen) other "indicators" (which by themselves are worthless (holy geez, (parentheses everywhere.)))

Ha, nice try and nice guess - boy, you's guys are on edge here, huh? I can't blame you and I suppose everyone is suspicious of a noob . . . but you were all noobs yourselves once, too, and I take complete responsibility for how I'm "received." I'm not selling anything because I know how to trade :) (oh, AND make money while I'm at it, guess that's important to distinguish) - but here's a hint: I don't use "indicators" . . . I equate that to asking for a critique on a painting when it's right in front of your face. Yeah, I know "techno" is the trend (no pun intended) these days, but I prefer organic myself (there - can you guess my real super-duper indicator?)

However, I do like the whole point of the video - how can you not? - and it did make me laugh . . . It goes back to the post I made in the "trading vs. gambling" thread - that little trade-ster was refusing to accept reality.

I'm not saying nobody uses any of all of those indicators that makes a ton of $$. Yes, I've said a lot I'm sure a lot of peepal disagree with but it's fun to evangelize to any audience, welcome or not (that's just my nature, I'm an a-hole (though usually not this profane (but you will find i love me some parentheses (if you did not already notice.)))) (<did I close them correctly? (yeah, I think i did.))

Anyways, looking forward to value-added discussions w/ you all - and thanks for the vid.
 
michael922 said:
Funny thing is all those "indicators" he was spilling don't *%&#^%* matter. Smoke-in-mirrors hoax, they are, to get all of us looking at the wrong things.
Click to expand...

So, anyways... I guess no one agrees with that (that they don't matter) :cry:. Don't stand between a trader and his indicators. Sheesh.
 
michael922 said:
Oh, a free invitation for my pitch? Why hide it? Here we go! It's the Super-Duper Bull$&!*-o-Meter!

"The body is three-quarters of the length of the candle" ... Ha! are you kidding me? That's subjective, unscientific garbage - at least to me - because it doesn't seem to be based on rational hypothesis/es. In other words, it only equates correlation with cause, but don't we all know the reality of the relationship between the two? OK, OK, there might be some merit to some of those indicators and they all just might work for you (they HAVE to work a little bit, otherwise no one would... how do you say? ... bite), and while correlation might not constitute cause I will admit that doesn't mean the correlation is irrelevant, but they *all* require subjective judgement (i.e. inform a "decision to trade" rather than a "signal to trade" and if you DO use it as a "signal", kiss yo' money bye-bye) and/or need "affirmation" of (maybe half a dozen) other "indicators" (which by themselves are worthless (holy geez, (parentheses everywhere.)))

Ha, nice try and nice guess - boy, you's guys are on edge here, huh? I can't blame you and I suppose everyone is suspicious of a noob . . . but you were all noobs yourselves once, too, and I take complete responsibility for how I'm "received." I'm not selling anything because I know how to trade :) (oh, AND make money while I'm at it, guess that's important to distinguish) - but here's a hint: I don't use "indicators" . . . I equate that to asking for a critique on a painting when it's right in front of your face. Yeah, I know "techno" is the trend (no pun intended) these days, but I prefer organic myself (there - can you guess my real super-duper indicator?)

However, I do like the whole point of the video - how can you not? - and it did make me laugh . . . It goes back to the post I made in the "trading vs. gambling" thread - that little trade-ster was refusing to accept reality.

I'm not saying nobody uses any of all of those indicators that makes a ton of $$. Yes, I've said a lot I'm sure a lot of peepal disagree with but it's fun to evangelize to any audience, welcome or not (that's just my nature, I'm an a-hole (though usually not this profane (but you will find i love me some parentheses (if you did not already notice.)))) (<did I close them correctly? (yeah, I think i did.))

Anyways, looking forward to value-added discussions w/ you all - and thanks for the vid.
Click to expand...

Michael - The thread is an excercise in irony or lulz (subtle humour):D

If you want to seriously discuss your trading approach then why don't you start your own thread :D
If you try to post a rationale of your approach on this thread it may be lost within the torpid waters of irony, humour and the nothing in particular levity which runs through this thread like the blue vein in smelly cheeses and with no more predetermined course than a strange quark:LOL:
 
Wow, Neil, I didn't notice before the fish-hook you threw out there...

That a strange quark has no predetermined course.

Ah, my friend - but it does, it DOES.

RANDOM...

does NOT EXIST...

in REALITY.

And if you believe so, you're just apologizing for your own inadequacies (not you, Neil, not you... SERIOUSLY - inflection is so completely lost in the written word, esp. in today's space/internet age... not you.)

Or...

Yes you??????
 
neil said:
Michael - The thread is an excercise in irony or lulz (subtle humour):D

If you want to seriously discuss your trading approach then why don't you start your own thread :D
If you try to post a rationale of your approach on this thread it may be lost within the torpid waters of irony, humour and the nothing in particular levity which runs through this thread like the blue vein in smelly cheeses and with no more predetermined course than a strange quark:LOL:
Click to expand...

I thought that he was the comedian, Neil.
 
Come on. Seriously.

What a sandbox... name-calling pippers.

Random does not exist in reality.

Can YOU challenge that? Bring your equations, bring your Einstein.

Gosh, I want a real challenge, not name-calling.

Gosh, mike... so exposed... so exposed.
 
Okay - sheesh, you guys are f a k i n g MEAN.

I just ask to be indulged in an *intelligent CONVERSATION.* (No name calling, which is what I've subjected myself to).

There, I'm on display and unmasked.

You guys suck.

"Random does not exist in reality:"

forget "my implications" and challenge the "rhetoric,"

Pete, all you have to "go on" about quarks is what you've been told; but what if the conclusions drawn are a product of forced, salary-paid anti-conclusion, anti-science that has been published, in a strict, ordained, structured amount of time, which truly does not address REALITY (or else that "scientist" (ha!) would lose their job??)

No? Another petulant, character-assassinating remark? Esp when I'm being as jovial and light as possible (whilst being honest as to my own opinions...)??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
 
michael922 said:
Come on. Seriously.

What a sandbox... name-calling pippers.

Random does not exist in reality.

Can YOU challenge that? Bring your equations, bring your Einstein.

Gosh, I want a real challenge, not name-calling.

Gosh, mike... so exposed... so exposed.
Click to expand...

No, I can't challenge that. You must believe as you wish. I do not believe that buying and selling is a co-ordinated attempt by more than a certain number of people to make the market go in a certain direction in the short term

The actions of that certain number of people will be countered by a certain number of people going in the opposite direction. How many people and, just as importantly, how much money? It's a random calculation. Most of us all reason. The market does not. It is random.

Eventually,, a direction will come out of it.

That's my view and no one has made me change it, so far. The reality should be faced, the market is random in the short to medium term, at least, which is why we use stops, I suppose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

neil
A Forex Trading Education
Replies
2
Views
2K
neil
neil
neil
1-2-3 Trading style
Replies
2
Views
2K
p-lab
p-lab
B
Birmingham/Midlands
Replies
2
Views
2K
montpro
montpro
M
MCX Crude Oil Trading Concepts for New Traders.
Replies
1
Views
5K
Nikhil Dogra
Nikhil Dogra
S
Trading UK shares
Replies
10
Views
4K
CityTrader
CityTrader
Top