Hi, I'm a novice too, I'm interested understanding whether hedging is appropriate for stocks. At the moment, I confess, I really don't get it. I am sure there is simply some error in my thinking so I'd be grateful if anyone could set me right.
So,
1. If you buy two "things" whose prices are expected to be inversely correlated then what you gain on one you lose on the other, zero sum game, except for transaction costs.
2. If the "things" are not 100% correlated then you are only really taking a punt on the difference.
3. If you decided to dispose of the loss making one after some movement has occurred then from that point onwards you may as well have just started with a naked long trade.
It seems to me to be the same whether one is an amateur trader or a big company trying to protect its business denominated in foreign currency.
I can see how things would be different if at least one of the "things" was an option, i.e. doesn't involve the same outlay until the market has moved. Is that "the whole point of hedging"?
Thanks
ta ta
Duncan