Ideally reducing them in size is the best thing to do - but at the same time I'd rather you post an oversized chart than no chart at all - not sure what others think? What would be the ideal situation? If the image starts to stretch the page, then rather than show it, provide a link to a pop-up window to display it. I think it's when it stretches the window and it become difficult to read the text on the page that it becomes a problem.
So, I'll increase it those 24 pixels.. but if you can crop it in a paint package, then great!
saw you were having a look at it and as you havent responded
assume you are as non-plussed as I.
However I have been back into the code for my application
and the chart is drawn from 10,56 to 692,386 coordinates.
so it should be smaller than the yahoo chart.
But when I run the program it is displayed in window resolution
I have to conclude that its size is being misreported by ?windows?
I dont remember having had trouble in posting charts from this program before, so may I also conclude that the introduction of an upper limit of 1000x1000 was fairly recent ?
previously I had set the defaults in Paint with
very small image attributes so that on loading a chart
the attributes would always expand to the size of the image being loaded.
But I have clean installed windows !
so all the defaults have been reset. In the case of Paint
the default size is 1024x768 !
Which means that regardless of the size of the image, the frame
was preset to 1024 etc. And of course, its the frame size that is critical.
I have now reset to my small size.
As a result, the charts and the frames are all smaller than 1024 etc....
So, having been a pain and asked you to increase the 1000x1000
it is clear that it was unnecessary.
And that is why I had not had any problems previously.