I'd be interested to know how far they went in establishing the visit to his friend as fact.
Phone records, card receipts in friends location at time of trades.
As they likely don't exist, judge is obviously on shaky ground.
Unless there is concrete evidence he wasn't in the house,
and no remote login (mobile / mates PC) judge is a moron, probably paving the way for similar claims.
SB will appeal, with a good chance of a win, and hefty legal fees
for the SB plank customer 😆