Trader333 said:There are various views on this depending upon what you require but in my view it is still difficult to beat the service offered by www.interactivebrokers.co.uk
Paul
garyhamon said:. IB was my 2nd. They were ok. I had trouble with "stop loss hunting" (sudden and very short term drop in bid until stop loss trigger and then, within a few ticks, the price returns to or near where it was before.) I am NOT saying IB did it but it's never happened .
garyhamon said:I've had 3 different brokers. IB was my 2nd. They were ok. I had trouble with "stop loss hunting" (sudden and very short term drop in bid until stop loss trigger and then, within a few ticks, the price returns to or near where it was before.) I am NOT saying IB did it but it's never happened since I switched to Scott Trade but it did break me of using stop losses while I'm online and watching my account, and I set my stops deep enough it has never happened since. Besides, once my account grew so that I was having to buy several thousand shares at a time their fees (.01 up to 500 shares, minimum charge of $1.00 US and .005 cents thereafter) got a little steep. Ex: 5000 shares cost $27.50 while I now often trade 10-15 thousand shares for $7.00 with Scott Trade. It's a matter of your trading style and account depth. For now I'm sticking with Scott.
neil said:Has anyone tried this broker as an alternative to IB albeit Pacific may be a little more expensive. Pacific seem to be London based.
http://www.pacifictrader.co.uk/futures.asp
(Advertised on our (T2W) site at top of page)
peto said:After some time in their web site I still can't work out their commission structure. They offer 'gold' 'silver' or 'bronze' but nowhere are the relative benefits of each explained (although the latter 2 appear to be commission free ....must have that wrong!)
They have the ER2 e-mini contract down as worth $5 per tick when in fact it should be $10.
Not impressed so far......... .
IB are OK