Barjon's Money Machine

barjon

Legendary member
10,281 1,559
or the FTSE/DOW pair via SB


A bit ago CV suggested I put up to shut up (an argument progressing on some thread I can’t remember), so here’s the bare bones for your delectation and delight.

Not a trace of vendoring in sight – which should please pee bee and scose

Not based on any TA – which should please toastie

An itsy bit of randomness – which should please hare

Some mean reversion – which should please rob

Live trades on ftse futures thread (you have to hunt**) – which should please flashy and joe

No statements though – which won’t please joe at all

And no lulz – which won’t please a whole bunch of people

** latest here http://www.trade2win.com/boards/uk-indices/120172-anyone-scalping-ftse-futures-1298.html#post1917008 which is underwater at the moment (no cherry picking :))

ok, have at it gang :)

jon
 

Attachments

DionysusToast

Legendary member
5,963 1,498
The lulz will come...

Interesting stuff - how does it work with fills on the FTSE? Damn market is thinner than Kate Moss on Atkins...

Also - how do you actually get in & out? Are you using a spreader or handling it manually?
 

barjon

Legendary member
10,281 1,559
The lulz will come...

Interesting stuff - how does it work with fills on the FTSE? Damn market is thinner than Kate Moss on Atkins...

Also - how do you actually get in & out? Are you using a spreader or handling it manually?
All manual, toastie, and a good fill doesn't have the same imperative as it does for you.
 

DionysusToast

Legendary member
5,963 1,498
John - in a stat arb strategy such as this, is it not important to get good fills on entry & exit?

You are playing the spread, any slippage will effectively narrow the spread you are playing.
 

scose-no-doubt

Veteren member
4,630 954
s'why I've never bothered :confused:
 

ChocolateDigestive

Experienced member
1,153 280
John - in a stat arb strategy such as this, is it not important to get good fills on entry & exit?

You are playing the spread, any slippage will effectively narrow the spread you are playing.
No it doesn't matter if you are holding for hours/days. The spread at a bucketshop will be tiny compared to the trade result. For the intraday index arb guys they are mainly automated on the lower timeframes the fills are important in that space. the majority of HFT arb index guys are flat end of day for reason I won't go into.
 

scose-no-doubt

Veteren member
4,630 954
Well another reason I didn't bother is cos of the roll costs which I thought would make the strategy unemployable from an economic pov. Obv not if BJ is doing it.
 

barjon

Legendary member
10,281 1,559
John - in a stat arb strategy such as this, is it not important to get good fills on entry & exit?

You are playing the spread, any slippage will effectively narrow the spread you are playing.
Yes, but if I'm playing for a net +20 (say - what I aim for varies on current "relative" volatility and longer term strength or weakness "trend" in ftse if you see what I mean) the odd point here and there is not crucial.

Since I have to close manually and can't therefore close both at precisely the same time I can lose a few points in a fast market. Try to cater for that by closing the contra direction first. eg: if the market is hurtling down close the long first.
 

ChocolateDigestive

Experienced member
1,153 280
Yes, but if I'm playing for a net +20 (say - what I aim for varies on current "relative" volatility and longer term strength or weakness "trend" in ftse if you see what I mean) the odd point here and there is not crucial.

Since I have to close manually and can't therefore close both at precisely the same time I can lose a few points in a fast market. Try to cater for that by closing the contra direction first. eg: if the market is hurtling down close the long first.
Nothing wrong with manually legging in and out Jon. Plenty of spread futures traders use a bit of tradecraft to leg in and out manually.
 

Soloquan

Established member
646 24
John - in a stat arb strategy such as this, is it not important to get good fills on entry & exit?

You are playing the spread, any slippage will effectively narrow the spread you are playing.
I hear this quite a lot and maybe I'm misunderstanding the point totally. If I close a position at anywhere between 10-30 points from where I entered I don't mind paying a 1 point spread. I've had slippage yes but both positive and negative and never by anymore than 2 points.

Have I got the wrong end of the stick because I hear this so often "the spread will eat your account" so on and so forth.
 

ChocolateDigestive

Experienced member
1,153 280
Hi Barjon

Thanks for posting this. I am a big fan of spread trading a few months ago I read the below book, which is an excellent overview.

Amazon.com: The Complete Guide to Spread Trading (McGraw-Hill Trader's Edge Series) (9780071448444): Keith Schap: Books

Spreads are a great especially for beginners or struggling traders as they are more forgiving. They take out all of the emotion of trading one instrument and let you play the mean revert which is another mans strong trend. So if we know a spread is strongly mean reverting of course on a lower timeframe it will be trending towards the mean. spread trading is powerful especially if you cut your losers short and 'look to hit singles not home runs' that's a quote from the book above.
 

barjon

Legendary member
10,281 1,559
You use the same broker for both legs, Jon?
yes, if I didn't there'd be a greater lag in closing I suppose unless I ran it on two pcs as well. As I said though it's not crucial and I can't recall it being significantly damaging in the three or so years I've been playing with it.
 

the hare

Senior member
2,949 1,283
Have I got the wrong end of the stick because I hear this so often "the spread will eat your account" so on and so forth.
If you assume you have no edge, then spread will eat the account. A good example would be taking random trades, long or short on the toss of a coin. You'll win some, you'll lose some, and over a sufficiently large sample size you'll break even. In that scenario the spread will eat the account.

Although people don't like to admit it, the majority of technical based systems are no better than a coin toss in terms of edge, and therefore, they suffer the same fate.

Most new traders perform significantly worse than a purely random system, and their own incompetence is generally a bigger factor than the spread.

Spreads are the brokers edge, and its a MASSIVE edge, and overcoming that edge is far more difficult than most here would care to acknowledge.
 

Similar threads


AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

But it's thanks to our sponsors that access to Trade2Win remains free for all. By viewing our ads you help us pay our bills, so please support the site and disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock