Really like that approach! For me, just watching price like how it moves, reacts to news, hits support or resistance has been just as reliable, without faffing about with different indicators.
Everything ultimately resolves back to price. What’s interesting is how you’re framing it less as a single indicator and more as context: structure, time, speed, and relationships. Do you formalize any of that into rules, or is it mostly discretionary reading of price behavior?
I’ve noticed that a lot of traders constantly switch indicators when a setup stops working for a while. I’m curious about the opposite: the tools that have stuck with you.
Nice explanation! But could you tell me how using different timeframes can result in the market behaving differently while everyone is basically making decisions based on what the indicators are showing?!
Unfortunately it makes sense, but it is like without technical analysis there is something missing in trading.
And what do you mean by it working well for money management?
I don’t know much about EFT. I’ve only traded CFDs. I looked it up a bit, it doesn’t seem related to trading!
With CFDs, you get leverage, which really helps if you don’t have much money. When I started, I looked for brokers with high leverage. I traded small amounts, but the 1:3000 leverage...
I was wondering if most traders are looking at the same charts, levels, and indicators, wouldn’t their actions cancel each other out? Technical analysis works because people believe in it, but if everyone believes the same thing, does it still provide an edge
For those who’ve changed brokers, what was the tipping point? Spreads, slippage, platform issues, withdrawals, or just lack of trust? And did your new broker actually deliver what you were looking for?