Recent content by Foolish Thief

You were asked direct questions that you did not answer. So, if you put up a thread on a public board, with the expectation that questions are unforgivable, then I would suggest that it is YOU who might want to consider finding not merely another thread, but indeed, another board. Valid...

Let's distill this and locate the differential that makes it all work: Can ascertain direction. Clear indications it will end south. Those are some pretty big cards. In fact, with cards that big, one need not worry about where one places their entry, ever! Just enter a directional order...

Yale? A nice University, but I attended Berkeley and MIT. Precisely, what, was I looking for in this thread? The paragraph used was born of neither experiment, nor elegance [no fault of your own, as you were not the original author]. The reason is embedded within the paragraph itself: "The...

Agreed and removed from the Loser column. Placed into the No Trigger column. A 10 pip stop loss is a loss nonetheless. Using an 11 pip stop, still produces a loss. Using a 12 pip stop still produces a loss. The reason this trade was a loss, has far less to do with the location of the stop...

Here's the original quote: Mathematically, when you reduce all choices down to "ONE," that physically and logically eliminates all other choices. In other words, "ONE PAIR" cannot exist in the same domain as all other pairs, because of the unique exclusionary property that you assign to "ONE...

Oh, great. Another one bites the dust. The entire retail side of the business is being infected by brokers taking the other side of your trade and then claiming "Non-Dealing Desk Status" because a fraction of the deals that flow across their platform are executed by a private "club of 10."...

Based on that, I applied this technique to 16 June 2010 on the EURUSD_M5 from 0000 GMT through the hour of 0805 GMT, where no further trades were allowed under the rules stated above. Here's what I found: The Red circles are losers. The White circles are winners. The Blue circle is not...

Can you explain the logic behind this declarative statement? What intrinsic value does "one pair" have over "another pair" such that it carries a higher probability for yielding successful trades, where another pair would not? Foolish Thief