Spread Betting v Direct Access - The Annual Revisit

I'm sorry but to say that using a sb firm to trade is actually gambling and if you did it da then it's trading is complete rubbish!

People also seem to be saying that if you use a sb firm then you aren't very good and your not making a profit? more utter rubbish!

What would you prefer, pay 40% tax or no tax? Wow what a tough decision that is! I think some posters on here have a serious complex
 
Tax advantage :LOL:

You have to make money in order to pay tax or feel that you have gained a tax free benefit...let's make that clear. Are you saying it is easier to make money trading through a S/B over Direct access? I am saying that the answer is an unequivocal NO! You cannot scalp with a S/B firm, that is certain. You cannot scalp with a S/B firm, that is certain.
Why not play roulette..I believe winnings at a casino are tax free.

You have to make money in order to pay tax or feel that you have gained a tax free benefit...let's make that clear.
Stating the obvious has usually got dep seated reasons, ans I would rather not elaborete on them on a public forum.

Are you saying it is easier to make money trading through a S/B over Direct access?
I am not saying that at all.

I am saying that the answer is an unequivocal NO!
I do agree with you, making profits is difficult on both, spresdbetting and DA platforms.

You cannot scalp with a S/B firm, that is certain.
Thank you for this information I have heard many times. I do not scalp, so do not know it from my own experience.

Why not play roulette..I believe winnings at a casino are tax free.[/
If you want to play roulette, you are welcome, and enjoy it. Sorry I do not play roulette.

I do have live accounts with several platforms, and I do not see a marked difference between them. Some spreadbetting platforms have different systems to execute and maintain the open position/s, and one has to get used to it. In some cases some DA platforms might be a bit easier in that aspect, but that is all.
Hope it helps.
2be
 
Last edited:
In Sheffield! :eek: :LOL: ;)

absolutely! I love it here, seriously.

Give me my steel city, football team, family and freinds (who I'm shortly out on the lash with) over a shopping center in the desert, anyday:p

UTB
 
If one is trading a personal account where the payable tax is enough to take evasive action, then:

* Given the account size, I would expect the trader to understand the advantages of DMA over SB for professional trading.

** The trader should have the accumen to move their affairs offshore.
 
What would you prefer, pay 40% tax or no tax? Wow what a tough decision that is! I think some posters on here have a serious complex

It is not that simple and the rate is no longer 40%. The spread on SB if you are trading intra-day and frequently will cost a lot more than using DA. If you are position trading then it is a different story in my view.


Paul
 
If one is trading a personal account where the payable tax is enough to take evasive action, then:

* Given the account size, I would expect the trader to understand the advantages of DMA over SB for professional trading.

** The trader should have the accumen to move their affairs offshore.

I agree with MrGecko - to expand on this further the confusion seems to arise as to when not to use SB's and when to go the DMA route:confused:

The answer to this in my experience is that some SB companies can not handle bets as low as £20 per point, very few of these bookies can handle SB's up to £50 per point before they start to fiddle the price and use delay /stealth tactics.:(
Personally if my bets were of a considerable size than I would seriously consider DMA.

Joe
 
Grant,

I think comparing an individual small time trader which in the grand scheme of things we all are, to a multi national company is not really appropriate for this discussion.

If you take a general round number of 50k per year for example, run it thru a tax calc online and you could either pay total deductions of £14,407 or obviously not pay it thru a sb interface.

For 100k your deductions are a massive £34,907!!

Surely you can accept the point that not paying tax is better than paying tax?

Nice hypothetical numbers which prove absolutely nothing. This is the sort of answer I would expect from someone who has just opened a spred bettin' account with the pocket money his mummy gave him rather than a real trader. There are many reasons why DA is professional and spred bettin' is non-professional and NONE have anything to do with hypothetical earnings. Those who are compelled to dig deeper will find out what they are.
 
I have no idea what you mean when you say spread betting in non-professional - what does that mean?

For those of us who know how to trade- a few pips here and there from the SBs makes no difference whatsoever - I accept this as a cost of tax free trading - and besides - it works both ways - sometimes I gain from it - sometimes I lose.

As a 40% tax payer in my job, Sbs make my life so much simpler. I am already beyond the CGT limits for 08-09 and not having to declare my trading on my tax return and pay out 40% of my years profits is worth far more than those "unprofessional" lost pips.
 
Lee Shepherd and Ziggler, read what i wrote again, but this time READ it, think a bit, and then reply.

Quoting myself: "the spread bet doesn't influence the supply and demand in the market"....

so thank you for telling me something i already know...

unbelievable. Just read it and before getting het up about the fact that someone disagrees with you, just think for a second.

And yes, the PnL is the same.
 
Ohi forgot, thank you Hoggums, basically mate, just let these guys carry on...they'll (maybe) one day figure that out. "unprofessional indeed".....cowboys.
 
I have no idea what you mean when you say spread betting in non-professional - what does that mean?

Exactly the sort of question a spred betta would ask.

Tell me, exactly, what does the MARKET price of an instrument mean?

Don't google for the answer!

In order to sort out wheat from chaff you have to know what wheat AND chaff are, don't you?
 
Ohi forgot, thank you Hoggums, basically mate, just let these guys carry on...they'll (maybe) one day figure that out. "unprofessional indeed".....cowboys.


Why don’t you provide a proper insightful answer like a professional trader then? One that merits proper discussion? There are reasons, verifiable FACTS as to why Spred bettin’ is non professional. When two carpenters discuss which is the right tool for a job they don’t bring up inappropriate points like how much money they make as proof. Without mentioning how much money you make or how you trade or how much tax you avoid or any other superficial amateur points. Give me your reasons as to why Spred bettin’ is professional.
 
You know what i partially agree with you - where you say one should provide proper insight that merits discussion. I'm not going to bicker on here all day. I have better things to do. But all i'll say is pull your head out the sand and stop being so old fashioned...because i'm sure as someone who probably trades a lot, if you think about the pnl again you'll agree. Or, keep paying your stamp duty and tax....it doesn't affect me.

That's me done on this topic.
 
ultimately mqate, we're trying to help you - but you're just too bloody proud to accept any advice. So carry on wth your "unprofessional rhetorici' and i'll carry on with my spread betting account.
 
Top