Waar gaat dit eigenlijk nog over
What seems to be the problem here?
The first assumption based on a recollection was that Mercury Retrograde was primarily bearish. So I responded with the cold hard facts showing you something else. Now you even humbly want to challenge my recollection as opposed to yours, forgetting that I have constructed my own attachments? Huh I am lost in… well, respect.
The assumption that Technical Analysis would not work when Mercury is Retrograde is a joke and nothing else. Come up with the cold hard facts. What Technical Analysis are you talking about that is supposed not to work anyway since there are even conflicting forms. And back to your first assumption; if Mercury Retrograde is bear; and Technical Analysis does not work as normal: than the Technical Analysis in your view points Bull. Have you ever seen Technical Analysis reports pointing all in the very same direction?!
The ancient Greek used an early version of astrology and I did not mention any gods from the mythology since you brought it up perhaps an other area the facts will have to be straightened : [According to Hesiod] "Hermes was the son of Zeus and Maia. He presided over commerce, wrestling, and other gymnastic exercises, even over thieving, and everything, in short, which required skill and dexterity. He was the messenger of Zeus, and wore a winged cap and winged shoes. He bore in his hand a rod entwined with two serpents, called the caduceus. You probably were mixing up Greek and Roman mythology.
The striking thing once again is in the reading part and the distinct difference between reading what is actually written and reading what you think is written. Any form of discussion can only happen based on synchronized facts rather than assumptions so unless you come up with facts I am not going to waste any more energy, it’s a lovely sunny day. As Rentenier pointed out in his last post it is better spend in the sun than looking at a computer.
Have fun anyway.
