Sharescope

Principle

Newbie
Messages
1
Likes
0
I bet quite a few Sharescope customers have received one of their snotty little emails or letters demanding that you pay an extra subscription if you download shareprices more than once a day.

They allege that if you're downloading twice a day you must be (horror of horrors) downloading onto more than one computer ( irrespective of the fact that the UK close prices and the USA close prices have to be downloaded at different times to keep your share data current).

When are these greedy whingers going to start putting their customers first rather than regarding us as cash cows that they can milk their profits from.

Sharescope will claim - wrongly - that they're contracts with data suppliers insist that they take action against any customers downloading more than once a day. Sharescope are wrong - they don't.

My own preference is Updata and Fairshares who deliver a great service and are happy for you to download as many times as you like. As for Sharescope - it's high time someone put them in their place or, as I'm tempted to do, take them on in court.
 
Sorry but I wasn't aware ShareScope did US shares?

I subscribe but have never seen the option for US shares.

JonnyT
 
JonnyT said:
Sorry but I wasn't aware ShareScope did US shares?

I subscribe but have never seen the option for US shares.

JonnyT

I'm sure they don't do US shares. However, the US index data is updated after 10.00 PM, i seem to think.

Cheers,
UTB

PS -I haven't received a letter about paying for 2nd downloads :?:
 
Why the fuss? Anyone who is serious about their charting wouldn't be using Share Scope anyway. It's a bit basic for even my modest abilities and looks like an early Windows 3.1 programme.
 
That's what I used it for. I now use Fairshares for portfolio. I'm not sure how accurate Share Scope's CGT calculations are. I have seen discrepancies. Fairshares is very good. I use Updata TA for charting. Theres nothing better IMHO.
 
GruntnoWay said:
That's what I used it for. I now use Fairshares for portfolio. I'm not sure how accurate Share Scope's CGT calculations are. I have seen discrepancies. Fairshares is very good. I use Updata TA for charting. Theres nothing better IMHO.

Whilst I agree that TA purists can do much better than Sharescope, its' customers (for whatever reason they use it) are entitled to be alarmed at "stealth" increases, surely?

UTB
 
Last edited:
JonnyT said:
I just use it for my portfolio management, nothing else.
JT
What about the fundamental info - Sharescope's greatest asset IMO?

I realise your 'usedtobeafool' status but fundamentals surely have a place in running a share portfolio.
 
The only fundamental I need to know at present is our much Oil is E&P company may find in the next two years and compaing that to the current NAV...

JonnyT 95% invested in E&P stocks.
 
GruntnoWay said:
That's what I used it for. I now use Fairshares for portfolio. I'm not sure how accurate Share Scope's CGT calculations are. I have seen discrepancies. Fairshares is very good. I use Updata TA for charting. Theres nothing better IMHO.

can you give me the link for Fairshares please
hornblower
 
Principle said:
I bet quite a few Sharescope customers have received one of their snotty little emails or letters demanding that you pay an extra subscription if you download shareprices more than once a day.

They allege that if you're downloading twice a day you must be (horror of horrors) downloading onto more than one computer ( irrespective of the fact that the UK close prices and the USA close prices have to be downloaded at different times to keep your share data current).

When are these greedy whingers going to start putting their customers first rather than regarding us as cash cows that they can milk their profits from.

Sharescope will claim - wrongly - that they're contracts with data suppliers insist that they take action against any customers downloading more than once a day. Sharescope are wrong - they don't.

My own preference is Updata and Fairshares who deliver a great service and are happy for you to download as many times as you like. As for Sharescope - it's high time someone put them in their place or, as I'm tempted to do, take them on in court.
Have spoken to Sharescope today and they have confirmed following:

You can download data more than once in a day as long as it is downloaded on one machine only.....Not on two different machines as each machine is a separate License. For intraday data you can download again as many times but on one machine only.

I can confirm that I have downloaded EOD data more then once on my machine and have NOT received any snotty e mails from Sharescope as alleged. I have used Sharescope more than 3 years now and have no complaints about their service.

US data is avilable on their intraday service which I is called PLUS version. I have used it and it is very good indeed.

I have asked them to respond to this message and make it clear for all.

My preference is Sharescope and Metastock combination which has worked very well indeed.
 
Hi all

I have been asked to respond to this thread by several ShareScope customers - in particular the first posting.

At first I thought that because the posting was rude and involved prams and toys that people would see through it as something that is tantamount to product placement by a newbie. (Hmmnn – you are a newbie discussing a product too I hear you cry!)

So, I will take some valuable time out of other important tasks, such as getting US stock data into ShareScope (shameless plug), to set the record straight – or at least give our side of the story.

ShareScope has a one licence per machine policy – much the same as Microsoft and numerous other software vendors. This policy has always been the same and has always been enforced. We have ways of tracking users that are updating more than one machine and are, usually unwittingly, in breach of our software licence. One of these methods involves analysing a user’s update pattern so we sometimes refer to “downloading data more than once per day” in our communications with customers – I will explain this in more detail below.

Where we think that ShareScope is being updated on more than one machine, we contact these people and explain our policy. We do not “demand” a second subscription payment. We suggest that if they are using ShareScope on two machines then they either uninstall one copy (and use ShareScope’s back-up facility to keep all of their settings and portfolios), or that if they really do want and need two copies of ShareScope (because they cant live without it ;) ) then they pay for two subscriptions. Users paying two subscriptions only pay the membership fee once and only pay two subscriptions prospectively – we do not seek back payments. This is how we enforce our software licence. It is not a “stealth” price increase. We are not “snotty” or “greedy whingers” – we are fair and open and trying to protect our intellectual property: if the price of ShareScope went up because you were subsidising multiple users of the software how would you feel?

We do not claim that our data vendors require us to take action against people updating twice a day. Our contracts with our data suppliers require us to protect their intellectual property – i.e. their data. There are restrictions on copying, selling and re-transmitting the data – and if we suspect users of this, then in some circumstances we are required to report this to the supplier and to support the supplier if it chooses to take further action.

We always put our customers first. Whatever you think of the ShareScope software and its pros and cons for your own trading style, our support team is second to none – you always get a person who sees your query through to a conclusion – no computers asking “press this key for blah…” – no “well it isn’t happening to anyone else so we cant help you”. We pride ourselves on our support. We try to operate fairly at all times – if you buy an annual subscription you can cancel mid-year and get a part-refund…. I don’t know of many competitors that offer that. If you exercise your 30-day money back guarantee then you are usually refunded the same day (ditto).

We do not regard our customers “as cash cows that we can milk [our] profits from.” ShareScope is renowned for its value for money: we are a private company with a long term view that constantly fights to keep prices down: unfortunately I will never qualify as a “fat cat”.

Johnny T – we have recently introduced a second daily update for US closing index values (DJIA, S&P500, NASDAQ 100, NASDAQ Composite). US closing stock prices are coming soon to Plus and Pro.

GruntnoWay – our CGT calculator works in 99% of circumstances. I agree that the presentation could be a little clearer but I am only aware of two very specific circumstances where our CGT calculator returns the wrong result. We are quite open about this and the problems are posted in the software under “know issues”. They are in certain circumstances where there is a rights issue involved and the correct calculation of business asset taper relief on AIM shares. That said, I have spoken to Accountants that use ShareScope to calculate CGT because “it is better than the specialist tax software on the market”. But if Fairshares works for you then great – I wont berate the competition – just defend my corner.

Zambuck – you have brought us to book over some data anomalies in the past  Yet again, I have to thank you, this time for policing these boards so effectively. On a personal level I find that Internet discussion groups are best when they are self-regulating.

What Zambuck says is true:

You can update ShareScope more than once a day – we positively encourage it now that there is a 6pm UK closing price update and a later US index update. On Fridays there is also a midday update with Investors Chronicle views included – as someone quoted candidly on another board recently – “useful if only to see what not to buy”. Each to their own 

We will only contact you if we believe that you are running ShareScope on more than one machine with just one licence. That communication may refer to “double updates” in the context of two machines but this is NOT a reference to the perfectly allowable and encouraged updating of your ONE machine TWICE (or thrice) a day.

Finally – A question for “Principle” – if Updata and Fairshares are your preference then good for you – but why are you so disgruntled with us about being asked to pay for a second ShareScope licence? If ShareScope is not so important to you, why do you need it on two computers?

Phew!

ShareScopeGM

P.S.

Here is the text of our letter so that you can decide for yourself…


Dear ShareScope Member,

It would appear from our records that your ShareScope password is regularly being used to download data more than once per day.

I would like to bring your attention to the first term of our license:

'1.1 Ionic gives the User a personal, non-professional, non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use ShareScope for the User's own personal use on one dedicated personal computer in the normal and proper course of the User's personal investment interests.'

If you are updating more than once in order to supply different versions of ShareScope, we appreciate that you may not have been aware of this condition. However, even if the computers belong to yourself, you will need an extra license for each version of ShareScope you wish to update, or you will need to limit yourself to updating only one version. Extra licenses are available on request. We are restricted by our own license agreement with our data suppliers, and regret that we are not able to offer any flexibility on these conditions.

We would appreciate it if you could please contact us as soon as possible in order to discuss how you would like to proceed. If you do not believe that you have breached this term of the license agreement, please contact us so that we may resolve this issue.

Many thanks for your understanding and co-operation.

Kind regards

Melissa Kearney
Ionic Information
 
zambuck said:
My preference is Sharescope and Metastock combination which has worked very well indeed.
Metastock is good but its obvious you don't use point 'n figure charts. Over the last year I have used them more and more and can't do without them. I used to have metastock but they were no good. I haven't used Sharescope since they added PF but if the image I got emailed by a friend is anything to go by, I won't be. ;)
 
Thanks for clearing that one up - I wondered why I'd not received any emails.

Just to counter some of the negative responses above, though I had suggested there are better TA packages out there, for a data source I think SS is superb, and excellent VFM.

UTB
 
ShareScopeGM said:
we have recently introduced a second daily update for US closing index values (DJIA, S&P500, NASDAQ 100, NASDAQ Composite). US closing stock prices are coming soon to Plus and Pro.

Kind regards

Melissa Kearney
Ionic Information

I have been unable to update US stock closing prices until the next day, and have tried to download data several times to get the updates at night (having already updated earlier in the day)
you originally said these should be available after 22:30 I think it was?
 
I have been able to update US indices prices at 2230 as they have promised. This has been a tremendous help.

Sharescope just gets better and better. There is nothing anywhere near it for the UK market. I also have Metastock which I use rarely. I am not a huge indicator guy anyway, so any decent charting package will do it for me, but I also need fundamental information like NMS, capitalisation, directors dealings, major holdings, parent index name etc for my trading. Only Sharescope does all this for me.
 
GruntnoWay said:
Metastock is good but its obvious you don't use point 'n figure charts. Over the last year I have used them more and more and can't do without them. I used to have metastock but they were no good. I haven't used Sharescope since they added PF but if the image I got emailed by a friend is anything to go by, I won't be. ;)
...Obviously....??....I don't use P & F....??....Actually I have moved on after using them ever since my Indexia days....P & F is not the only one that forms part of my trading criteria....However having said that I have been pushing Equis about the features I would like to see in P & F in MS so who knows....

The ones that I think work better than P & F are the 3 line break, kagi and renko....All these I learned to use after reading about them in Nison's second volume....I tend to use them more than P & F...

Sharescope's P & F is very good indeed.....I have choice of log and box values etc.....I think you need to use it to see....Don't just rely on pictures send by someone to make a judgement....
 
zambuck said:
...Obviously....??....I don't use P & F....??....Actually I have moved on after using them ever since my Indexia days....P & F is not the only one that forms part of my trading criteria....However having said that I have been pushing Equis about the features I would like to see in P & F in MS so who knows....

The ones that I think work better than P & F are the 3 line break, kagi and renko....All these I learned to use after reading about them in Nison's second volume....I tend to use them more than P & F...

Sharescope's P & F is very good indeed.....I have choice of log and box values etc.....I think you need to use it to see....Don't just rely on pictures send by someone to make a judgement....

LOL. voice of authority.
 
Top