Price, (Volume), Support, Resistance, Demand, Supply . . . (Abridged)

This is a discussion on Price, (Volume), Support, Resistance, Demand, Supply . . . (Abridged) within the Price & Volume forums, part of the Technical Analysis category; Originally Posted by GirlPower How about a really simple statement of what the relationships are between these aspects? Support and ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Legendary Member
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,476
dbphoenix's Trading Profile
Exclamation Price, (Volume), Support, Resistance, Demand, Supply . . . (Abridged)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlPower
How about a really simple statement of what the relationships are between these aspects?

Support and Resistance are points where respectively, Demand overshadows Supply and Supply overwhelms Demand. That would assume no other direct or indirect manipulation of the price - just straightforward buyers & sellers.

High, lows and particularly round number points are likely SR points (especially decade points).

Recent High/Low points also act as SR points. Current day, previous day, weekly, monthly, 52wk Highs & Lows.

Where the bunny hits the mincer is when we look at the relationship between Price & Volume.

DBP, you're an expert on this, why don't you give us your take on it?
You're on the right track, but allow me to make a few modifications.

S/R are not points where demand overwhelms supply or vice-versa. They are rather points or levels or zones at which the movement of price might be affected due to the fact that price was affected there earlier by demand overwhelming supply or vice-versa. In other words, a swing high occurs because supply overwhelms demand, at least for the time being, but one cannot assume that a swing high is going to act as resistance simply because it's a swing high. It must also act as resistance in order to be resistance. If it doesn't, then it isn't. Again, this is not to say that highs, lows, round numbers are not potential S/R. But they are not actual S/R until they actually provide S or R.

As for the expert part, I'm just looking for the truth, and I've learned that the truth is to be found in price. Understanding the behavior of price is the real trick.
dbphoenix is offline  
Legendary Member
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,476
dbphoenix's Trading Profile
dbphoenix started this thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by barjon
dpb

If the price reverses at a resistance level it can be either that new supply has come in or that demand has been withdrawn - presumably you look to volume to tell you which?
If the "resistance" level has demonstrated that it provides resistance and price reverses there, it could be doing so for either of the reasons you suggest. Volume provides a clue, but since volume is only trading activity, one has to look at the relationship between volume and price. If, for example, there's a lot of activity and price is difficult to budge, then one can assume that demand is insufficient to outdo supply. That may not be the case if buyers can trigger short-covering, but you play the hand you have. OTOH, if there's not much activity but price rises anyway, one can assume that there is at least some demand, but not enough selling interest -- yet -- to curb it.
dbphoenix is offline  
Legendary Member
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,476
dbphoenix's Trading Profile
dbphoenix started this thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChartMan
I agree about accumulation occuring at a price due to "institutes" wanting to buy big vol at price x, with the help of MM's.... however, on idecies, I think accumulation occurs in a band where the market in general ( the big boys) prepare for a move.
Where it occurs isn't as important as how it occurs and how long it takes. Generally, "accumulation" that takes place quickly won't take enough supply out of the picture to enable a move that is significant enough to generate more than a paltry profit, if any.
dbphoenix is offline  
Legendary Member
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,476
dbphoenix's Trading Profile
dbphoenix started this thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackcab
The problem with pure price/volume analysis is not being able to split buy volume from sell volume systematically, you can only do it by studying the day's trades and it's prone to error. If I'm wrong there, someone let me know. In looking at price/volume alone, how can you know or at least get a feel for buy/sell volumes within the single volume figure reported?

I looked at 10 years EOD of one UK big cap and found no relationship between t-1 price movement and volume movement and t0 price movement (perhaps a very slight tendency for price to continue downwards if previous day's price was down and volume was up, but probably insignificant). It was a crude analysis however, in preparation for something finer which I'm working on).

In practice do you end up concluding that the high volume candle/bar at the bottom of a dip meant buys kicked in and added to the existing sells giving high volume overall, AFTER the event? During the event you could as easily assume it was sells increasing to accelerate the down move. Early thoughts on this and quite basic.
Volume in and of itself is reflective only of trading activity, such as the number of shares traded. In order to know whether it is indicative of demand or supply, you have to look at the results of all this activity, i.e., the effect on price. In other words, there is no such thing as "buy" volume or "sell" volume; there is only volume, since a buy cannot take place without a sell (or vice-versa). What makes price move up is not the buys in and of themselves, but the demand.

As to high volume at the bottom of a dip or W or rounded bottom or whatever, again, it depends on the effect on price. If there's a lot of volume and price doesn't fall, then you can assume that the selling is exhausted and that aggressive buyers can buy the bounce, or that more conservative buyers can begin the accumulation process, depending on the context. If volume is high and price continues to fall, then selling is not yet done and buyers are not willing to do more than take shares off the hands of panicky sellers; they are not, in other words, anywhere near ready to pay a premium to stop the decline. The fact that the volume is high, however, suggests that selling is near an end.

Of course, "high" is relative and has little meaning unless it is placed within the context of a chart. One man's selling climax is another man's continuation unless one looks at the forest.
dbphoenix is offline  
Legendary Member
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,476
dbphoenix's Trading Profile
dbphoenix started this thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackcab
But within any single volume bar the ratio of buys to sells isn't 50:50 is it, the MMs don't keep perfectly flat books within short timeframes. On say an EOD chart, I don't see how you can say that the high volume at the bottom of a decline is due to exhausted sellers and aggressive buyers IF every buy & sell are matched - if they were matched and vol is high, there's still a ton of selling. They get matched of course but over time is what I'm getting at. Maybe this is getting OT and I should get my thoughts clearer.
There can't be a buy without a sell. What moves price is not buyers but demand. If buyers aren't willing to pay what sellers want, then sellers have to drop their price. Otherwise, no trade takes place.

This is a biggie, so don't try to swallow it without chewing on it for a while.
dbphoenix is offline  
Legendary Member
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,476
dbphoenix's Trading Profile
dbphoenix started this thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porks

These and other tape reading studies are useful, but I'd love to hear how you go about creating specific criteria for entering and managing a trade.
My experience has been that rushing into the premature creation and definition of setups is a serious mistake, though not everyone will agree with this. Trading via price and the interpretation of buying and selling pressure requires a certain way of seeing and nearly always requires that a great deal be unlearned.

This is not to say that one just ought to stare at charts being formed all day, every day, day after day, with no objective other than to endure the experience. However, it's important to note how price moves, and to try to figure out why it moves that way.

To a large extent, that's where S and R come in, so perhaps one of the first steps is to develop an understanding of S and R.
dbphoenix is offline  
Legendary Member
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,476
dbphoenix's Trading Profile
dbphoenix started this thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porks
Dbp,

Here's my take on S and R

- Floating supply must be removed to penetrate resistance.A move up through resistance mainly occurs not because of increasing buying but because of an absence of selling
- It takes professional money to penetrate Resistance, and higher volume with movement in the price action to confirm a valid penetration

- A market will only fall through a support area when there's an absence professional buying
- Again increasing volume with price movement within the bar confirms a break through support

When prices are approaching both support and resistance on decreasing volume this shows a lack of interest from professional money to participate at these levels and prices are more likely to reverse.

Porks.
You seem to be equating R with supply and S with demand. You may have better luck by equating R with selling pressure and S with buying pressure. Buying, selling, support, resistance, demand, supply are related, but they are distinct.

For example, if there's an "absence of selling", there can't be any buying. In order for a transaction to be completed, there must be both.

Similarly, volume has nothing to do with whether a penetration of S or R is valid or not. Volume often comes later, if at all. And of course, if S or R don't provide S or R, then they aren't, though they may have been at one time.
dbphoenix is offline  
Legendary Member
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,476
dbphoenix's Trading Profile
dbphoenix started this thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porks
dbp,

Would it be more correct to say :

A move up through former resistance mainly occurs not because of increasing buying but because of an absence of selling pressure.

A move down through a former support area occurs when there's an absence of professional buying pressure.


Given your point on volume is correct, how would you judge whether a move towards former S and R areas is likely to continue through, by price action alone ?

Porks.
A move through "resistance" occurs because buying pressure is greater than selling pressure. An absence of selling pressure in and of itself may mean no movement at all.

As for the "professional" part, I'll side with Paul. What difference does it make? You make or lose money over price movement, not as a result of who's moving it.

As to whether or not the move is going to continue, nobody knows. There's no way TO know. That's where your rules come in.

I'll reiterate that demand, supply, support, resistance, buying pressure, selling pressure are all related, but distinct. Unfortunately, the meaning of demand and supply have become corrupted, like "overbought" and "oversold". Supply, for example, does not refer to some hoard somewhere that is drawn upon in order to satisfy and overwhelm demand, like a trainload of avocados. Thinking of it in this way is not productive, or even useful, and it can lead to errors in perception which can lead to further errors in strategy creation, trade entry and trade management. For example, thinking of supply as a pile of something can lead to expectations that it will eventually run out. These expectations may not occur if one perceives the activity as selling pressure instead. Selling pressure can last for a good long while.
dbphoenix is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Price, (Volume), Support, Resistance, Demand, Supply . . . dbphoenix Price & Volume 1041 Aug 23, 2009 2:28am
Practical Application of "Price, (Volume), Support, Resistance, Demand, Supply " Remiraz Price & Volume 11 Oct 11, 2006 9:24am
Price/Volume - Support/Resistance - Position Trading bracke Price & Volume 0 Sep 14, 2005 10:02am


New To Site? Need Help?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 9:04pm.


Copyright © 2001-2009 Trade2Win Ltd