The Da Vinci Code or TA?

[T2W Bot]

This is a forum thread for discussing the Knowledge Lab Article, "The Da Vinci Code or TA?".

 

[fxmarkets]

Vendor

"To be a part of the group of people who recognise the absolute importance of market analysis, one has to subscribe to the view that technical analysis is fundamental. "

According to whom ? I read these adverts and it underlines typical analysts do not have a clue as to whats going on in the markets, typically relying on the latest OB , OS index in an attempt to rationalise market behaviour .

Accountants (excluding Jim Slater, ive got a soft spot for that guy,lol ) maybe should stick to counting beans, im sorry identify ,measure, record and communicate economic info to permit users of the info to make informed decisions....... what do accountants know about psychology in the markets?

Im all ears> lol

Nice bookcase though.

Fx.

 

[dcraig1]

Why do Elliot wave advocates always sprout a load of nonsense about golden means, ancient Greece, nature of the universe, shape of the human body etc etc to justify fibs. To me it just sounds like an exceedingly poor sales pitch.

If there is something to fibs and Elliot wave it should be demonstrated by backtesting, trading portfolio performance or some demonstrable connection with how markets operate. Numerology just doesn't cut it.

 

[LevII]

This article seems to me to give no useful information.

On the contrary, a trip to the advertised web site shows this is an invitation to subscribe.

Why does the author not have a "vendor" tag to her name?

 

[timsk]

This article seems to me to give no useful information.

On the contrary, a trip to the advertised web site shows this is an invitation to subscribe.

Why does the author not have a "vendor" tag to her name?

Agreed LevII
The K' Lab' is an altogether inappropriate place for this article, IMO. Indeed, the high quality of the K' Lab' will start to erode quite quickly if work of this standard is now being included.
Tim.

 

[jimbo57]

auditors!

I've yet to meet an accountant even in a trading firm that truly understood trading, let alone one who worked for a firm of auditors.

 

[options]

Ah Jimbo.

There are some around.

The person I credit with teaching me the finer points to trading and actually turning my trading around, so I have more plus days (quite a lot) rather than minus days, used to be a forensic accountant many moons ago, and has been an independant full time trader for around 15 years or so now.

So there are some about.

But I do know what you mean. Don't we all know a lot of people that could not organise the proverbial p*ss up in a brewery.

 

[theEdge]

This does not say anything useful.

 

[options]

Snap then!

😆

 

[robq]

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/pseudo/fibonacc.htm

sceptical view on Fibonacci

 

[PKFFW]

Look at us we have come up with the next "big thing" with an 80% success rate!!!

This is the kind of hyped up, no detail claims everyone knows to stay away from if found elsewhere on the net.

 

[Sharky]

Yeah I agree, will consign to the waste paper basket now...

 

[Sharky]

This article is no longer available, I'll cherry pick something juicy myself - as Jill is away on hols at the moment. Stay tuned...