Recent content by SamHamrick

  1. S

    (LSE: SRX) Sierra Rutile, the African hidden gem at London Stock Exchange

    This forum has traders been in the markets before I was born, I'm not crazy to come and flog shares on their land. But I see this share as a real phenomena at LSE, so I came here to share my ideas and listen from you, and that's why I posted this post in different channels to collect as much...
  2. S

    (LSE: SRX) Sierra Rutile, the African hidden gem at London Stock Exchange

    Actually I wish that small investors and day trader keep away from this share, I see it as a long-term investment
  3. S

    (LSE: SRX) Sierra Rutile, the African hidden gem at London Stock Exchange

    I can't get your point up till now. what is wrong with sharing information. All of us is mature and adult, and knows how to analyze what he/she reads, and comes out with his/her decisions. And as I told, I'm not trying to convince investors to buy this share
  4. S

    (LSE: SRX) Sierra Rutile, the African hidden gem at London Stock Exchange

    Does posting the same research in different channel makes me a scammer ?
  5. S

    (LSE: SRX) Sierra Rutile, the African hidden gem at London Stock Exchange

    1st of all I don't want anyone to buy this share, it is already has only 10% of its stocks in public hands. 2nd This is stock is really undervalued. 3rd this is a big forum, no newbies around, so no one, will read my post and jump to buy 10,000 shares just because he read what I wrote. 4th...
  6. S

    (LSE: SRX) Sierra Rutile, the African hidden gem at London Stock Exchange

    Could you please inform me. which part of my message could be considered as a scam ??
  7. S

    (LSE: SRX) Sierra Rutile, the African hidden gem at London Stock Exchange

    Dear readers, I wrote this to introduce you a very undervalued stock, some consider it the most undervalued stock in the mining sector, it is (LSE: SRX) Sierra Rutile limited. I consider this stock the hidden gem at London Stock Exchange, and this consideration is backed by multiple reasons...
Top