Recent content by nine

I know it's a little offensive to tell you this but on reading your response I yawned and hoped you actually trade.

Follow your rules not your impulses. Read and deeply understand Bob Volmans Understanding Price Action. See if you can combine trend with reversion for better outcomes.

So this guys is our beloved Rusky Troll right?

Not in my opinion. If you gain by trading in trend direction you'll probably develop levels of certainty. Suspect. Worth trading against. Wrong so get back on. Etc. I like wave counts, swing breaks and trendline breaks with some confirmation but you'll need to find what speaks to you.

There does seem to be some confusion here. If you have zero spread, bid and ask are the same so a trade takes place. If you trade in ticks the minimum is 1 and 1 or 2 is likely fine especially if its fairly consistent. Also companies make money by other mechanisms than just spread so focus on...

He's making a statement that is not mathematically correct. However it might be a reasonable approximation for his purposes although I'd expect standard deviation to balloon more for extreme moves. Compare Bollinger bands to Keltner channels to see this.

I think 1 and 2 are examples of 3. So 3.

Interactive Brokers offer this sort of functionality in their paper trading mode. I just checked and it's available without a funded account. https://gdcdyn.interactivebrokers.com/Universal/Application?ft=T&spltst=www

No. Like bloggers, even doctors have a fruit cake factor and 0.0001 is pretty low.

So of 12 Million doctors, 200 would sign the document. He'll, I'm convinced.

I recommend avoiding indicators as much as possible (if you succeed, ultimately they'll be gone although the odd ma & maybe the vwap might sneak in from time to time if enough of the money in your market watches them). Also skip expert, human, or even artificial advisors. You must develop your...

Nice job CV. Glad to see someone else realising that lawns are ecologically unsound.

That specific limitation applies only to the historical data.

If you stuck with "what's good about this" rather than creating fake straw men you'd be on sounder ground. Disparaging something you seem to know little about makes you look foolish. Instead, if you expound on your method it could be an interesting thread.

OK. I enjoyed that post and find it difficult to pick holes in. I'm not sure if its 95% or some other number but to me it varies from worse to better depending. A big part is finding the areas/times/situations that can offer 60% vs the areas that are 99% say. I've spent some time trying to...