Recent content by KIMMRUNNER

If you accept that reynolds system is essentially a combination of... (a)Finding a passionate market (b) Creating or locating information products to sell in to that market (c)List building by offering good information for free (d)Funnel marketing, ie selling more advanced products higher price...

That is an incredibly negative view: Sure , the presenters pitch a package of mentoring - and there are people eager to buy. But Lets give one example of what you missed. Derek Gehl is a legend: - Partner of Corey Rudl and founder of IMC - he spoke for around 4 hours and every minute of it...

So have you ever looked at the packages Derek Gehl and Janik Silva offer? It does not appear so from what you have written. First, they cost around £2-£3K - Tiny in the scheme of either setting up a abusiness or trading. Second they give you a long money back guarantee, so heads you win, or...

Thats far too negative. Direct marketing done correctly works. There is no doubt about that, and Reynolds is an expert at it. He tells people how to do it: and the reality is very few follow through: I went to bootcamp, and go to most of these things: The free information given by the...

Lag on averages Im not a great fan of simple average crossing systems, But you can eliminate some of the worst effect of lag by using more sophisticated digital filters. So if a simple EMA is coded as Av(n)= Av(n-1)+Coeff*(Price(n)-Av(n-1)) Then you can get a better response use several...

Sorry to sound dumb! What is "lhub"?

JDR I was trying to help you by ,explaining a number of clear misconceptions you have of the markets & trading schemes born of evident & total lack of experience. Wont waste my time again - you are attitude is clearly far beyond help , so I will not respond to any of your posts again Like...

a few random picks are outperforming him ?... And my point is you have no evidence at all, much less proof, whether or not you are outperforming him, or even close. Compare your 5 year results as a mixture of backtesting and trading if you want to comment on how schemes compare. Even 3...

I have been looking at some of his trades and they are interesting. The problem he has is that he is going the wrong way about impressing an investor.if speed is of the essence. He has only three choices: (a) To carry on posting a history, but I doubt that any investor would be convinced on...

Missing the point YOU are missing the point. as you have proved in this post, and most of your others: in this and in other threads. You seem to think that a positive balance on your account rather larger than this trader above signifies that he is not doing well, and you are doing better...

Cool it JDR JDR - As a newcomer to trading, I really do think you have neither the track record nor the eperience to be as rude as this to another trader who has been brave enought to post his trading for all to see - and I am disappointed the moderators have not removed your post. It is...

Other things to consider in the "spreadbet vs CFD" argument: are - --The tax benefits of spreadbetting. --Consider the value of protection under FSA for your money. By and large spreadbet accounts are protected as a separate client account and have ombudsman protection, where CFD accounts lie...

Entirely agree!! -it was out of order! I posted on another board a week ago, regarding the psychology of buying trading schemes, and was quite AMUSED to be told that (a) I knew nothing about psychology ( how would he know?) and (b) I was told categorically that trading schemes were more or...

SCAM - dictionary definition 1. a confidence game or other fraudulent scheme, esp. for making a quick profit; swindle. When I pay £30 for a book on trading, I at least expect the author to have confirmed to standard of proof " a balance of probability" that the ideas he presents are viable...

Forget which thread, but there was a post by a manager at one of the spreadbet companies on one of these boards a while ago that confirmed the number for his organisation in particular - think he said 82% - and then commented this was pretty much the industry average reported by the futures...