Recent content by henry766

try Alpari , 30 seconds and u get to choose when (+60+120secs)

Making 150 per day is very very difficult , but not much easier than making 1500.

As yopur new you want to take advantage of offers to new customers , many are offering 300£cash back at mo , you maybe able to even offset 2 offers at once and thus gaurantee a profit , give you a good start , be warned though , you'll probably lose far more than you think .

there allsorts of wiered and wonderfull seasonals out there , some probably coincidence , but I think one premise is that busy times tend to be positive ( closes and opens etc ) in general

Another quick one , a guy called jack schwartz( i bel;ieve thats his name) did a lot of work ( and wrote a book, which i have ) in which he researched short term "seasonals" on ftse 100 index , i.e, which days of the year "traditionally "finished up /down etc with percentages and even down to...

My pleasure wanto , what did you think about tradinga percentage rather than a fixed amount?

Thats true , i'm not suggesting he should take silly risks , and as i said in the first place 99% of the risk is that his idea isn't genuinly profitable at all , but look at how much money we're talking here , if he bets less, even if if he is as profitable as he states , he's probably not even...

if you have a a 90% winning strategy that only occurs once a year , you should put plenty on ,and I believe george soros at all would agree with me , 12.5% means it's "unlikley to happen , whats more were not talking his life savings here, I don't want him to do anything ,it's just not a very...

Just a quick one to shakone, if you had a 90%win rate , the chances of losing the first 2 in a row are 81 to 1 i believe , possible but not really happening "so easily".( camaroon are shorter odds at ladbrokes to win world cup)

p.s. 52% drawdown is slightly more than £250 and the profits many thousands.

You must remember that if his system is genuinley profitable then he is at any given time more likley to have more than his original capital than less(( as long as he hasn't gone bust yet)hence my suggestion to trade 20% rather than fixed amount ), but as regarding risk , didn't george soros...

negative , positive etc , why don't we just go with the truth , some make it most don't , and to believe almost any system works is just plain wrong in my book , but it's nice to see someone with a nice sense of balance.

you believe practicly any system works? with mm and discipline ? I won't be investing thanks

Thanks for keeping this civilised mean reversion ( not sure what the mean reversion is , but my own trades are fades of sorts ) , I think the point I was making is that if you have probability on your side , the risk of total loss quickly becomes less as the probability works its magic and...

Not as risky as stated as long as gains are real as it's unlikley string of losers from the off ,a string of losers is far more likley down the road , but if his returns are real his % risk will be reducing quite quickly as his capitol rises i.e. if he makes it to second year it takes 41 losers...