Recent content by shail31

I stand corrected. The recent move on the Swiss franc caused by the Swiss National Bank’s unexpected policy reversal of capping the Swiss franc against the euro has resulted in exceptional volatility and extreme lack of liquidity. Retail client funds continue to be segregated in accordance with...

It's not about guts,the brokers normally hedge against their clients,alpari failed to do it.This would have prevented their loss and the clients.The only explanation is price moved very fast,everything was cut off,could not fill in the orders. This is not black and white .You just cant say...

From what I figure about financial loss:It implies the loss you suffered because of the chf trade.So if you had money till then it should come back i.e. the balance before the chf fiasco should reach you unless your balance is above£50,000

Yes I agree stop losses can slip but there has to be a level , the fca definition is best execution for the client. It is their responsibility.obviously they had no safety net as they went bankrupt. This is evident from the fact they allowed client balances to run 100,000 or more in the...

FCA insists that firms regulated by it need to provide best execution. So if a stop loss is trigerred 900 pips or lower clearly is poor execution. Hence fca covers for as much 50,000 gbp.Nothing sure though.

Anyone have a clue if the fca will reimburse those who have lost money due to stop losses not actiavted leading to a close much much lower i.e. around 900 pips or more?

Hi,Does anyone have a clue if those who suffered massive losses during the eur/chf crash when stop loss was not trigerred and the trade was closed at a shocking 900 pips or much lower will be reimbursed by the fca? This surely is not best execution?