Recent content by janebowles

  1. J

    Clown's 2007 outlook is work in progress

    Well found! And now hoping for the development of the SHS!:eek:
  2. J

    Clown's 2007 outlook is work in progress

    I am still looking at the third attachment of your 391 posting and I must say that the index behaves admirably in conformance with your outlook/work inprogress. My "chapeau" for that. I was wondering if your outlook for the second half year is still similar to the projected one. @ Pacito...
  3. J

    Clown's 2007 outlook is work in progress

    No, but there is no longer life in this thread. I like to read your postings as well in the Koffiekamer of the IEX.:eek:
  4. J

    Clown's 2007 outlook is work in progress

    Have a great holiday!
  5. J

    Clown's 2007 outlook is work in progress

    The equivalent of Hermes in Roman mythology is Mercury, so both are the same gods. For the rest, indeed, there are a lot of differences between the two of us. So let those be. I am already lying in the sun (having mowed square kilometers of lawn). Fun to you too
  6. J

    Clown's 2007 outlook is work in progress

    In my humble opinion trading is an essential part of communication. Mercury was for the ancient Greeks, among more, the god of trading. Internet did not exist in those days. That technical analysts most of the time are wrong during the Retrograde is - again in mho - not because they do their...
  7. J

    Clown's 2007 outlook is work in progress

    It's far from being TA-related but still the Mercury Retrograde has often been proved to have a negative influence on stockmarkets. See the attachments in this thread of Clown. The retrograde has started the 15th of June and can be influential untill the 10th of July. So, who knows...
  8. J

    Clown's 2007 outlook is work in progress

    Pacito, does this mean that your scenario's of 31 May and first of June (:31 July 480-490) are no longer an option? Thanks, by the way, for developing your ideas here :cool:
  9. J

    Clown's Weekly 34.

    It is strange, of course, reading the comments here, that GJN, in any case for today, seemed to be on the right track. Is it possible to throw a new light over the negative reversal that was seen here and the opposite direction the Dutch Index choose today? :idea: With respect Jane
  10. J

    Clown's Weekly 34.

    "want" is not exactly the right word here, since my posting is already several days, if not a week old. So, what i wanted to contribute then was just: we're going probably down first, before we will go up again. Is this more clear? Fine. I wish you and your family a merry X-mass and all the...
  11. J

    Clown's Weekly 34.

    :rolleyes: Hello! That needs to be tackled by the bulls? That needs to tackle the bulls for a short while, so it seems to me.
  12. J

    Clown's Weekly 34.

    An update would be fine... Otherwise this thread will die.. :rolleyes: :idea:
  13. J

    Clown's Weekly 34.

    Pacito, the bounce for the moment doesn't seem strong enough to cross the former top at 490,2 ...
  14. J

    Clown's Weekly 34.

    Thanks a lot for your warning. Implications are clear. JaneB
  15. J

    Clown's Weekly 34.

    In any case the oisters, coquilles, calva nor the cider have blurred your view on the idex! The possible set-back and the dates you mention for that could eventually get an FA-support from the results of the American pre-elections. The date for that is the 4th of November, isn't it? Thanks for...
Top