In that case Ladbrokes financial really is as 'proper' a financial bookie as any other and is hopefully unlikely to moan at me taking pocketfuls of cash from them. I'll see how it goes, it's got to be better than BOM anyway.
Surely any forward thinking bookie seeing a winning track record that can be clearly monitored online (as opposed to creeping drunkenly into random betting shops) would overhedge the winner's selections and just enjoy the free bonus? Maybe that's too idealistic. Oh well. I'll check out the...
Bet On Markets have recently added a 0.03% percentage rule that makes intraday bets of an hour or so much harder to win. Are there any companies that offer the same kind of intraday doubles as BOM before the change? (I know about Ladbrokes but they only offer two currency pairs)
If they have a deal with Cantor then are the bigger bets not likely to be hedged anyway? Why are people assuming that Ladbrokes financial betting acts any differently to others who won't close accounts of proven winners?
It's only not worth the money if it's not worth the money. Has anybody actually tried their demo? They allow you to demo the Euro grid only for a little while free of charge to assess its potential. I keep meaning to but haven't so maybe somebody will volunteer to trial it properly?
That's going to be SG warrants then that you trade through Barclays. They have some interesting 'Run with the Bulls' warrants at the moment. I'll expand if anyone is interested but seeing as I'm the first person to post here in 2006 (!) I'll wait and see if there's any point.