| Re: Deadline June
A degree of freedom is simply a parameter or variable you can change. So, for example, a system which stakes 1 pct of equity when a 10 day MA crosses over a 50 day MA has 3 degrees of freedom. Generally, any system with more than 5-6 degrees of freedom (I know it's not many) will be less likely to work over several markets under varying conditions.
There is no question that developing a system takes hard work. I spent about 3-4 months researching and backtesting before trading a medium term trend system, at the start of this year.
There are a limited number of ways to trade. You're either looking for breakouts/trends, or range behaviour/reversions to the mean. Let's say you choose breakouts.. whether you buy on the breakout of a Bollinger band, or a Donchian channel, it's kind of the same thing.. over time the systems will look broadly the same.
The real challenge comes in sticking to the system. If you design a system with positive expectancy, then you might save money by skipping one signal, but if you keep doing it you will eventually come a cropper. This is the psychology side, and it's far more important than the system itself.
Think about backtesting.. you're trying to find something that has performed well in the past. Almost by definition, it's unlikely to perform as well in the future.
So in summary --- don't spend TOO long on the system development side.. that's kind of the easy part compared to the mental challenge of sticking with the system. You mention a system that looked good in testing then "blew up badly".. this is exactly what I mean. You have to suck it up through the drawdown and trust in the positive expectancy.. this is the hard part, believe me. |