Trading the NQ

This is a discussion on Trading the NQ within the Trading Journals forums, part of the Reception category; Originally Posted by dbphoenix Price makes a HH to a higher UL of the TC, stopping out the short trade ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 1, 2017, 10:18pm   #33
Joined Feb 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbphoenix View Post
Price makes a HH to a higher UL of the TC, stopping out the short trade off the short-term DL break. The short-term DL is now fanned.
Where was the short-term DL break?
Attached Thumbnails
nq.png   nq-daily.png  
Jericho574 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1, 2017, 11:59pm   #34
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
Joined Aug 2003
dbphoenix started this thread I was referring to the DL before the break, beginning with the first week of February. As of now, after being fanned, it begins at 12/30.

I don't draw many lines on my charts. I've been more interested in the steady march of higher lows since 2/2. The break of these on the 23rd and 24th was clear, and I considered this to be important given that it was at the UL of the TC. After becoming accustomed to this, one is able to see a change in character without drawing lines at all, in real time. Price then retraced two days ago, triggered the short yesterday, and the short was SO today.

I've pointed out in the book and probably somewhere in these threads that trading off very tight lines carries its own risk. However, if the trade is successful, one is able to enter much earlier than he would if he were to wait for multiple confirmations. And the risk is minimal if, as in this case, the REV takes place at an important level. And we've been working our way toward this level since early 2016, over 1500pts ago. And the downside is substantial, even if only to the median. However, after such a rise, one can't expect price to turn on a dime. We go back, again, to price risk and information risk and avoiding biases no matter what.

Those who have put in their observation time will know what the endgame is for parabolic moves. This doesn't mean that one shouldn't enter on a RET here if the opportunity presents itself. But he must have assessed the risk and, again, avoid bias.

I was interested to see somebody from Barron's post a chart just like mine, beginning with 2009. He saw the possibility of a 5% correction. However, a 10% correction would take us back to the median of this channel, and it isn't as though this hasn't happened before.
__________________
Trading Price
dbphoenix is online now Training literature vendor (e.g courses / spreadbetting guides / eBooks)   Reply With Quote
Thanks! The following members like this post: Gring0
Old Mar 6, 2017, 9:37pm   #35
 
Gring0's Avatar
Joined Aug 2015
Interesting times again. I see another DL breach and a Ret. Whether it turns out to be so or a BO + pullback leading to another leg up is up in the air. OB conditions are not to be taken lightly. "You snooze you lose" gained its reputation around these levels.

Last edited by Gring0; Mar 6, 2017 at 10:21pm.
Gring0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2017, 8:37pm   #36
 
Gring0's Avatar
Joined Aug 2015
Nq

NQ Weekly: Flirting with OB territory.
NQ Daily: DL breach and small TR.
NQ Hourly: Two TRs.

Price is stalling here and it's hard to tell which side the demand or supply dynamic is going to end up favouring. Considering price is at levels more suited for shorting potential after a run up I am alert to any sudden changes in activity that might indicate a time to enter. On the hourly there's a TR inside a TR indicating a state of indecision. If price ends up moving up I sit pat.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Gringo
Attached Thumbnails
nq-weekly.png   nq-daily.png   nq-hourly.png  

Gring0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanks! The following members like this post: Kleft , Splitlink
Old Mar 15, 2017, 8:33pm   #37
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
Joined Aug 2003
dbphoenix started this thread So today's activity confirms the RET off the high from the 1st and the DL can be fanned. Whether price holds here, continues its ascent, or fails to advance remains to be seen.
__________________
Trading Price
dbphoenix is online now Training literature vendor (e.g courses / spreadbetting guides / eBooks)   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 16, 2017, 6:54am   #38
Joined Nov 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbphoenix View Post
So today's activity confirms the RET off the high from the 1st and the DL can be fanned. Whether price holds here, continues its ascent, or fails to advance remains to be seen.
Thanks, db. I trade NQ and FT and, yesterday, as it happens, I took a long on NQ and made 10 points, recouping previous losses on FT. Got my money back on the day.

However, it's a difficult market, for me, at least.
Splitlink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 16, 2017, 1:14pm   #39
 
dbphoenix's Avatar
Joined Aug 2003
dbphoenix started this thread The difficulty most likely lies in the market's being almost entirely news-driven for the past few months, and the half-life of news-driven moves is short. This makes keeping the bigger picture in mind even more important, even if one isn't trading it.
__________________
Trading Price
dbphoenix is online now Training literature vendor (e.g courses / spreadbetting guides / eBooks)   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2017, 4:20pm   #40
 
Gring0's Avatar
Joined Aug 2015
Demand seems to have gone on a vacation today. Perhaps this the beginning. The fact that the daily didn't continue higher and then fell back into the TR is worthy of note. The failure around the previous swing high and then demand weakening are the kind of signs that raise a flag. Daily has broken the DL and price couldn't maintain staying in the BO territory. Maybe there's some news but I don't follow news much. It's the bigger picture of price being in the OB territory that's worthy of attention.
Gring0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
Marvin Zark