Re: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis Quote:
Originally Posted by isatrader ..... The recent Stage 2 continuation move in June has failed and it's pulled back into the large Stage 3 range that developed over the last year. The Mansfield relative strength has turned negative and cumulative volume has broken down. So a number of negatives for this stock, however, as lplate mentioned it's sector is strong, and is actually the strongest sector currently by the Mansfield ratings, which as we know, would rule it out as a shorting candidate as per Weinstein's methods guidelines.
So I would rate it as in Stage 3B currently, as to become Stage 4A it needs to either break straight down through the major support at $33, or make a swing low in the current range and then break below that.
.... I can't remember where it it is in the book, but I believe he mentioned that you can sometimes break the rules for an exceptional case, especially when the market is range bound to help partially hedge you portfolio. ....
currently as we're in the sideways chop of Stage 3 that you need to be looking for only the most outstanding picks. i.e. that are in the strongest sectors, have the best relative performance versus the market; are showing the volume characteristics and have a little or no resistance to work through. Basically, the cornerstones of the method. So if it's not an A+ candidate, then stand aside. |
Thanks for your thoughts. I will offer a couple of thoughts:
1. there are places in Weinstein where the neckline might be a trendline, not a horizontal.
Alternatively, it may be that the Weinstein investor method is not in itself a good means by which to play stocks which are fast risers and sudden fallers. As you say, if it is not a short until it is about $30, then it will have already fallen by half from its high of around $60.
2. a sector contains stocks of very varying longevity and strength of fundamentals, especially NASDAQ stocks, so one logic may be that if a stock is falling within a strong sector, and within a rising stockmarket, then that could make it a particularly good shorting candidate (even if the reverse is more questionable).
Because of the diversity within a sector, it may then be that analysis of sectors is useful above a certain market cap, but below that level more subgroup analysys is needed, and we may decide to avoid investing below a certain market cap.
3. nevertheless as Rewardz shows, the Weinstein method puts you on alert that this stock definitely looks sick, and if you held this stock you would be very advised to prepare to sell, if you had not sold already.
PS thank you very much for the invaluable updates |