## Average down - small wins, big losses?

This is a discussion on Average down - small wins, big losses? within the Psychology, Risk & Money Management forums, part of the Methods category; When one averages down on a position, it entails taking only small winners when the price moves in the direction ...

 Oct 8, 2017, 9:25am #1 Joined Feb 2009 Average down - small wins, big losses? When one averages down on a position, it entails taking only small winners when the price moves in the direction of your position instantly and does not allow for more entries at a better price. On the other hand, your losses are made with your biggest position size. So, you have small wins and large losses. How can that be a profitable strategy?
Oct 8, 2017, 9:48am   #2
Joined May 2012
Quote:
 Originally Posted by pebesiak When one averages down on a position, it entails taking only small winners when the price moves in the direction of your position instantly and does not allow for more entries at a better price. On the other hand, your losses are made with your biggest position size. So, you have small wins and large losses. How can that be a profitable strategy?
There are possibly two trading concepts that may be in play and may look similar descriptively but substantively is very different depending on the risk management approach, position sizing and trade strategy. Averaging down and scaling in is like comparing apples and oranges.

If by your definition, averaging down as having small winners and large losses, then there is really no discussion needed as it is a simple mathematical expression of your win rate and RR.

 Oct 8, 2017, 9:53am #3 Joined Feb 2009 Please provide a practical example. Let's say your first long entry is at 1900. Then the price moves to 1902, so you exit with a small size. On another occasion, you enter long at 1900, the price moves down to 1898, you add more, to 1895, you add more and to 1890 where you exit with a big loss. How is that a viable strategy?
 Oct 8, 2017, 9:55am #4 Joined Feb 2002 Averaging down is a losing strategy. It is only recognised because many new traders will try it without understanding the implications. They don't find its sustainable and they disappear from the game before long. On the other hand, what successful strategy / strategies) are you planning?
 Oct 8, 2017, 9:58am #5 Joined Apr 2016 The only determining factor is whether you know which direction the market is going. Averaging down is not part of the picture. If you don't know which way it goes, the small losses will wipe you out just as big losses.
 Oct 8, 2017, 10:01am #6 Joined Apr 2016 tomorton is a good source of shop material. If you want to know what shops don't like, you can go by what he says.
Oct 8, 2017, 10:35am   #7

Joined Nov 2003
Quote:
 Originally Posted by pebesiak Please provide a practical example. Let's say your first long entry is at 1900. Then the price moves to 1902, so you exit with a small size. On another occasion, you enter long at 1900, the price moves down to 1898, you add more, to 1895, you add more and to 1890 where you exit with a big loss. How is that a viable strategy?
Whats your objective? Whats your desired size? Why would you be getting out at 1890?

Averaging down and scaling size are different things.
__________________
Me and you, we is largely the same bruv! We dont know shît! The difference is, I know I dont know shît!!

 Oct 8, 2017, 10:57am #8 Joined Feb 2009 You will be getting out at 1890 because you have reached your max position limit at 1895. Is averaging up not better? You lose small and win big
Oct 8, 2017, 11:01am   #9
Joined Apr 2016
Quote:
 Originally Posted by pebesiak You lose small and win big
Yes, that's better. Do that.

Oct 8, 2017, 11:06am   #10

Joined Nov 2003
Quote:
 Originally Posted by pebesiak You will be getting out at 1890 because you have reached your max position limit at 1895. Is averaging up not better? You lose small and win big
No, you want to be buying low selling high. What youve described is a stopping out, selling out low. You never want to be that guy.
__________________
Me and you, we is largely the same bruv! We dont know shît! The difference is, I know I dont know shît!!

Oct 8, 2017, 11:26am   #11
Joined Apr 2016
Quote:
 Originally Posted by darktone No, you want to be buying low selling high. What youve described is a stopping out, selling out low. You never want to be that guy. Check your pm
This buying low selling high sounds interesting. Can you PM me too with your technique ?

 The following members like this post: Kaeso
Oct 8, 2017, 11:37am   #12
Joined May 2012
Quote:
 Originally Posted by pebesiak Please provide a practical example. Let's say your first long entry is at 1900. Then the price moves to 1902, so you exit with a small size. On another occasion, you enter long at 1900, the price moves down to 1898, you add more, to 1895, you add more and to 1890 where you exit with a big loss. How is that a viable strategy?
You have already defined the problem more specifically as a loosing proposition in terms of the parameter which you have used to frame it unlike your first post.

In contrast, when scaling in which big players often do, they might used a variation of fractional position sizing. There are some obvious reason why such an approach is used. It is a wash and rinse to generate liquidity to get fills at wholesale prices. Big players because of their volume move market prices significantly and so they need to work on their order fills. They might actually have to sell to buy.

Oct 8, 2017, 2:28pm   #13
Joined Oct 2015
Quote:
 Originally Posted by pebesiak .. Is averaging up not better? You lose small and win big
Its kind of a personal preference. If you can handle having more winning trades that turn into losers in order to have a few that are bigger winners then this can work.

 Oct 8, 2017, 4:44pm #14 Joined Jul 2017 in my experience losers average losers... __________________ "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway. Count de Money number 1 trading rule: EDUCATE YOURSELF! Before you trade even single penny on the stock market, please spend the time and educate yourself by back testing different trading strategies and ideas - go to eBay and search for "historical stock market data", you can buy 20 years of data for less than \$100 - that's all you need to start.
Oct 8, 2017, 6:56pm   #15
Joined Apr 2016
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Kaeso Its kind of a personal preference. If you can handle having more winning trades that turn into losers in order to have a few that are bigger winners then this can work.
I haven't seen Dr Whatshisname since he said he was going to pyramid it big time. Maybe he won so much he no longer needs advice from the curve fitters on the internet. Same technique also won brewski big. I don't understand why he stopped and went took a job as a steamroller driver.