The Springboard

dbphoenix

Guest Author
Messages
6,954
Likes
1,266
A springboard can be said to exist when preparations have been made for, and the psychological moment has arrived for, a quick and important move . . .

Auction markets are in continuous flow from trending states to non-trending states. If a trader is interested in movement and momentum, he will likely be interested in a trending market and try to avoid a non-trending market (what is often called "chop"). Springboards serve to alert him to upcoming changes from one state to another. They alert him to prepare for a transition (whether it turns out to be substantial or trivial) from non-trending to trending or vice-versa, i.e., that point at which price is on a "springboard" to an advance. One can busy himself with questions of who's doing what and why (weak hands, strong hands, professionals, amateurs, intent, prediction, and so on), but none of this is essential or perhaps even important. What is important is being prepared for whatever hand the market deals you. In this way, one can maintain calm and objectivity, not dither with last-minute surprises.

What one does with what is in front of him depends largely on whether he is in a trade or he is looking to enter one. If he is in a trade, he's looking for signals that momentum is slowing. If he isn't, he may be looking for the same thing as an opportunity to enter, depending on what else is going on (e.g., is support being tested, is this the end of a parabolic move, has trading activity spiked or evaporated). However, before getting into all the possible tactics that can be employed to play these movements, I suggest that whoever is interested in this subject work toward finding these zones where traders are seeking balance (or equilibrium or fair value or whatever one chooses to call it). Again, these zones occur in all charts in all timeframes. And if one understands why they form, he is less likely to be freaked when his trade stops, much less retraces (he will, of course, have decided in advance what he is going to do when this unavoidable circumstance presents itself).

To start, a chart of the DJTA over the past four years (originally posted in March ’07). It could be any instrument over any time period with any bar interval, but I'm being specific -- and using bigcharts, which is available to everyone -- so that anyone who's interested can follow along. I've also deleted the periodic volume bars and used dots rather than price bars in order to turn attention away from what is immaterial and toward the movement of price.

Without any annotations whatsoever, one ought to be able to see that price is moving in a generally upward direction with occasional "pauses":

.
33502d1203184140-appendix-djta01.gif


.
If annotations are necessary, the following may be helpful:

.
33503d1203184140-appendix-djta02.gif

.
The exact lower (support) and upper (resistance) levels of these "zones" are not critical. What is more important in each is the general area in which the bulk of trades occur. What may also be important to the trader from a tactical standpoint is the "mean" within each of these zones toward which price will revert when bouncing around between support and resistance.

Note that each time price trends upward, it then stops or pauses in order to find equilibrium (or balance or fair value or whatever). It may engage itself in this for minutes or years, depending on time frame and bar interval. Once it has found this equilibrium, it gets comfortable. This is a "safety zone", and the bulk of trades will occur here. These pauses are not as dramatic as the trending moves because it seems as though nothing is going on. But more trades are placed at these prices than at the prices within the trending move simply because these prices are traded again and again over a period of time. This process lays the groundwork for what may become important support and resistance later (as opposed to, for example, a swing point, which, while dramatic, represents relatively few trades).

.
33504d1203184140-appendix-djta03.gif

.
Eventually, there is an imbalance, or disequilibrium, and the springboard makes good its name. Price emerges from this "comfort zone" and either reverses the trend or resumes it. The emergence may be gradual, or it may be dramatic, as with a breakout. Here, in June of '04, it moves up 200pts and immediately forms a new zone. Only later, in October, does it make a more dramatic move. But that, again, reverts into yet another zone in which traders seek balance, this one lasting for 11 months.

For those who aren't scalping and who like a deliberate approach to trading, the profit opportunities will most likely be found in the reversals which occur between support and resistance in these zones and in the breakouts which occur when price's state of equilibrium is fouled and it seeks a new one. But whether one trades reversals off of S&R or breakouts through S&R, he is working the edges and avoiding the "chop". If price isn't approaching S or R, much less testing it, he's waiting, and observing, and monitoring.

Traders rejected 5000 in May ‘06, then again in July. 4200 was rejected in August and September. This is a wide range, the mean of which was 4600. Price worked the area between 4500 and 4900 for several months, again seeking equilibrium. This equilibrium was broken in February, but traders have now returned to their most recent "comfort zone". This is where they can find trades and reasonable safety. Price may remain here and find balance either side of 4800 (again, this was posted in March ’07). Or it may try again to resume the uptrend. The reversals trader who doesn't mind trading tight ranges might trade here. The breakouts/momentum trader will wait for some determined move out of the range, either up or down. But he will not likely be searching for trades in chop.

If locating these zones or pauses in which these efforts toward balance and equilibrium take place is a problem, plotting "volume by price" can help:

.
33505d1203184140-appendix-djta04.gif

.
Note, again, that the bulk of trades are taking place within these zones. It is those areas with the fewest trades, those areas where traders are least secure, where the most potential for price movement -- often sustained price movement -- occurs. If one has no understanding of support and resistance whatsoever, much less where to locate them, this is as good a place as any to begin, and better than most.

As for hinges, these are an additional aid to spotting those areas in which traders are seeking equilibrium. They are created by successive lower highs and higher lows and represent a tightening and compression. If interest is sufficient, this compression will eventually lead to a worthwhile move (if it isn't, price may simply dribble off into nothing worth bothering with). As Schabacker later said, these hinges or coils should be "filled with price", that is, there is no aimless drift but a struggle between those who want to move price ahead and those who don't. Therefore, price should bounce in an ever-tightening range.

.
33506d1203184140-appendix-djta05.gif

.
Some current hinges to watch:

.
33521d1203343316-appendix-tri-hinge.gif
 
Cheers dbp,
Very well written and clearly explained, as always. Have you thought about putting this and some of your other 'articles' forward for inclusion in the K' Lab so that they don't get lost amid the plethora of less interesting and less informative threads?
Tim.
 
Great Post and very informative

Excellent work dbphoenix. :)

Hello Dbphoenix, thank a lot for your post. Extremely interesting and very enlightening. Simplicity is always the mother of success.

I really like your style of expression. The way you analyse price in relation to volume behind the everlasting auction process is simly remarkable.

This forum can be very proud and honored to have you as one of its legendary member.

A little rambling from me but just to show my great appreciation of your work.

I follow your posts since elitetrader and always happy to read about you.

Sincerely

Shreem:)
 
Hi DB,

I've followed your posts on & off for quite a while now as I like your interest in Price & Volume relationships.

Out of interest, over the years of developing this appraoch to trading, have you ever considered trying to "hard-code" your approach into a mechanical type of system or have you always traded in a discretionary manner?

Based on my own limited experience, I'm guessing that trying to "hard-code" these principles into an actual COMPLETE system is too difficult but as a much more experienced person, I'd be interested in your thoughts...

Personally, I have dabbled with coding specific price & volume relationships but thats as far as I've really got.....

All the best,

Chorlton
 
Trying to hard-code all this would likely be like baking a custard at high heat: one would end up with an unappetizing knot sitting in a watery pool. Instead of being rigid, one must be open and flexible, or, as Douglas puts it, "available". That may seem incompatible with my insistence that one must be exacting and define his setups carefully, testing them in order to determine whether they are of any real use or not, but whatever incompatibility there may be lies within the trader and not within the approach. Which is why a pilot or sailor might understand this more easily than a mathematician or engineer.

But none of this is to say that I'd discourage anyone from the hard-coding effort, even though I think it's a waste of time. Better to spend that time in front of the screen, watching price and volume move together, like at 3:30 yesterday afternoon . . .

Db
 
Better to spend that time in front of the screen, watching price and volume move together, like at 3:30 yesterday afternoon . . .

Db

As it happens FW and myself have been discussing this move in his group.

First chart is a basic line and second is a possible entry after the spring. Both YM.
 

Attachments

  • chartanalysisline.gif
    chartanalysisline.gif
    7.4 KB · Views: 454
  • spring.gif
    spring.gif
    16.5 KB · Views: 461
If you're referring to the springboard at 12250, yes. Though there's an earlier one at 12220.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Image5.gif
    Image5.gif
    11.2 KB · Views: 1,793
Last edited:
How about further down as well?

Apologies if this is off topic, and assuming I am using the right Wyckoff feature/wording, I was thinking a potential spring occurred at 15:16/17 as support was broken but price returned to the range and followed up with a small uptrend which then broke out and retraced on low volume, and as can seen on the 5 second chart, repeatedly.
 

Attachments

  • springboard1.GIF
    springboard1.GIF
    11 KB · Views: 429
  • ymspring.gif
    ymspring.gif
    12.6 KB · Views: 367
But how many times did it do this over the previous six hours? Even if you have some compelling reason to know that 12160 is going to act as support, it's been bouncing around there for over three hours, and volume has been crap. The clue to knowing that (a) you have an opportunity here and (b) you need to act is the introduction of professional money, and that takes place at 1530 on the dot. Once that takes place, however, it isn't going to hang around for twenty minutes waiting for the trader to decide what to do about it. That's why he has to know (a) what to look for and (b) what to do about it when he sees it. Even here, however, there are two opportunities to enter, one at 20 and one at 50 (thereafter, the little guy gets in and there's a lot of back and fill).

So, yes, from a theoretical hindsight viewpoint, the activity from noon to 1530 could be considered a springboard, but it has little practical trading value unless one could justify placing a buy-stop around 12230, then going to the movies.

A broader view might help clarify.

Note here that price has been crapping around between 160 and 220 for more than three hours. A lot of intraday traders have been trying to play this for most or all of those +3 hours. Eventually, even they will see this lengthy sideways movement and vow to stop poking at it and just leave it the hell alone until price vacates it. This helps to account for the very brief hesitation that takes place at 220 at 1530 which becomes a springboard for a further advance. And those traders who may be taking a more macro view and who may also have been stopped out more than once during the day and are willing to accept more price risk in order to be more assured of a "real" advance will wait for 250, which helps to account for the hesitation there (there are a number of factors which may account for its greater length and its greater range), but this eventually also acts as a springboard for a further advance before the more serious and prolonged struggle between 290 and 330.

.
attachment.php


.
And let's not forget the 5m, 15m, and hourly people, all of whom will be piling in at their own paces for their own reasons:

.
attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
 

Attachments

  • Image1.gif
    Image1.gif
    14 KB · Views: 1,280
  • Image2.gif
    Image2.gif
    7.8 KB · Views: 1,294
  • Image3.gif
    Image3.gif
    4.6 KB · Views: 1,278
  • Image4.gif
    Image4.gif
    3.1 KB · Views: 1,263
Last edited:
DB,

This was posted in another section and got negligible response. Perhaps you would like to comment?

Assume you're looking at a bar chart with volume showing a rise of 10-points on 2000 lots.
Reasonably, one could assume buyers predominated.

Now look at the DOM and Time and Sales. There are 10 lots on the bid, 10 lots on the offer. 10 lots are sold and the price ticks down. The next trade, as shown on T&S is a 1000 lots sold. However, this hasn't gone through the book/DOM and the price is unchanged, but it is added to the voluime on the chart. Therefore, it's contribution to price change is false.This leads to a distortion of the market picture and therefore questionable interpretation.

Grant.
 
I don't do either DOM or T&S, so I'm afraid I can't help you. But if the volume on the chart increased, I would assume that a transaction of some sort had taken place.
 
DBP,

DOM and T&S are not strictly relevant, being only to illustrate my point – some large trades do not go through the book, hence no affect on the price. However, it is recorded on volume bars. Hence, distortion of price/volume relationship and interpretation.

Grant.
 
If a transaction is completed and has no effect on price, then the parties to the transaction completed it at what had been the existing price. Whether this "means" anything depends on where in the stream between support and resistance the trade took place.
 
Top