The Dreaded Return of Five Minute Macro

BSD

Veteren member
Messages
3,819
Likes
988
GammaJammer introduced me to this blog, and he's definitely always worth a read:


"The Dreaded Return of Five Minute Macro

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Oh, dear. It looks like that most fearsome of beasts, "five minute macro", has made an unwelcome return. How else to explain the frenetic "risk on, risk off" swings that can most charitably be described as "erratic" and more realistically as "impossible"?

The "Great Fall of China" story was good for a few hours of juice yesterday, but even a poor five-year UST auction and tepid Beige Book couldn't propel stocks outside of their established ranges. Indeed, looking at 24-hour price action in S&P futures this week is pretty telling: there have been a few peaks and a few more valleys, but broadly speaking they're unched on the week.


spooz+intraday.gif


These kinds of markets are always tricky for Macro Man; short-term trading is not his forte, and he finds that cross asset correlations tend to weaken during periods of extreme noise. This, in turn, tempts him to layer additional, usually stupid, trades onto his portfolio. It's just as well that he's flying off soon and will disengage from micro-term price action.

Still, there are a couple of interesting developments that are worth keeping an eye on. The euro has traded very poorly indeed over the last 48 hours and seems to have broken its uptrend line against the dollar. Heck, even GS has stopped out of their research long. What's peculiar about this move is the degree to which central banks have been sellers of euros.


EUR.gif


It became clear a few weeks ago that they had ended a dollar selling program, and have since been content to play the range....in many cases trying to extract a pitifully small return from their punting. But all the while, money flows into these markets, with the CBs mopping up the flow (and accruing dollars.) If past behaviour is any guide, at some point the switch will flip for these bozos and they'll start buying EUR/USD more aggressively, and we'll get a pop higher, as was the case in May and June. In the meantime, FX will probably move in the direction that costs the most people the most amount of money.

Somewhat more interesting has been the development in fixed income markets. This week's two- and five-year auctions in the US have gone very poorly indeed; if today's seven-year auction makes it a hat trick, then there could be a bit of carnage. The eurodollar carry trade, having had a shocking setback after the payroll data in June, has subsequently recouped all those losses (and, in some cases, more.)

Yet it's all starting to roll over again.....much as it did, frankly, in the two weeks before the June downdraft. The chart of EDU0, pictured below, is pretty emblematic of the meaty part of the strip, and it looks pretty bearish from Macro Man's perch.

red+sep.gif


What odds that another seasonal adjustment-driven "improvement" in claims and a bad auction hat-trick generate a CTA puke-a-thon? Enquiring minds want to know.

Regardless, Macro Man cannot shake the feeling that markets are increasingly resembling a coiled spring. Tomorrow's US GDP print and, crucially, next week's payroll data could provide enough of a "signal" to push markets quite a long way in one direction or another.

Frankly, Macro Man's at the point where he doesn't care which way it all pans out, as long as it spells the end of five-minute macro."


LINK: Macro Man
 
Good too:

Trading and Sports

Monday, July 27, 2009

As Macro Man sits here on a rainy Monday morning, watching his portfolio meander, he is struck by the similarities between trading and sports. To be sure, he's hardly the first to draw that analogy. Finance is littered with ex-jocks and, probably much more so, ex-geeks who live out glories on the electronic playing field that they never experienced on the grass ones of their youth.

And of course, there are the literal crossover types, your John Henrys, your Mark Cubans, your Joe Lewises, who parlayed a successful career in finance into sports ownership. Oh, and then there's Lenny Dykstra.

While most of us at the coal-face of risk taking tend to think of ourselves in terms of athletes (after all, "stars" and "superstars" get paid the kind of money that would even make A-Rod or Cristiano Ronaldo jealous), in reality we're more like managers. You craft a team or a portfolio by filling it with the best trades or ideas that you can, and set it against both the market and other managers.

The best know how to grab a "young" trade just as it is bursting into effectiveness, and how to cash out of a mature one before it falls off a cliff. A well-crafted portfolio, like a good team, will feature a number of different players, each of whom is designed to play a specific role in maximizing the effectiveness of the team.

Of course, not every acquisition is successful, and it's entirely possible to add a "player" who on the face of it should complement the existing "team", but who for some reason doesn't work out. Call it the "Randy Moss to the Raiders" or the "Shevchenko to Chelsea" phenomenon.

As a manager, it is frustrating to acquire a player to perform a specific role and have him not execute or wander out of position. Similarly, it's incredibly irritating as a PM to put on a trade to cover you in the event of a specific outcome, watch that outcome arise, and see the trade not perform.

Sometimes, with a trade as with a player, you welcome "him" into the side and realize almost immediately that he doesn't feel right. What do you do then? Wait and hope he assimiliates, to the possbile detriment of the team? Or do you cut bait immediately, incur whatever transactions cost that entails, and try and acquire someone else to do the same job?

These are the issues that Macro Man is wrestling with at the moment. He introduced a new player into the team in the middle of last week who was intended to be a complementary player to the general thrust of his portfolio. And while this trade started well, performance has tailed off drastically. Suffice to say it's not doing what it said on the tin, and it feels wrong.

So he's in the process of extricating himself as quickly and painlessly as possible. After, when it comes to trading, winning is the only thing (as Vince Lombardi might say) that matters.

 
Just out of curiosity, BSD, why do you reproduce Macro Man's articles as opposed to posting a link?
 
Err, why not ?

Takes all of 2 seconds and makes it easier for others to read.

Lol !
 
so in the short end of the money markets macro man thinks the same as anyone else

short term we continue to grind higher on LIBOR
longer-term danger that any improvement and the curve steepens and eurodollar crashes off (check out put skew)
 
Err, why not ?

Takes all of 2 seconds and makes it easier for others to read.

Lol !
Hmmmmm, not sure clicking on a link is that hard...

In general, I would always prefer to read something that's linked rather than cut-and-paste'd. By the same token, I would like my content to be read in the original. Main reasons for this are the implicit possibilities for copyright infringement and violation of integrity of content. While I am sure you are not editing things and always credit the authors, the possibility is always there, which is why I make it a rule to avoid anything that's been cut-and-paste'd.

I know I sound a bit anal about it, but I do think these things actually matter... My Z$2c.
 
so in the short end of the money markets macro man thinks the same as anyone else

short term we continue to grind higher on LIBOR
longer-term danger that any improvement and the curve steepens and eurodollar crashes off (check out put skew)
Yep, every macro punter has the same view... Which is why, I'm sure, it's all gonna go in our collective faces (sorta has already with stocks, but more to come, methinks).
 
Martin has a point re links vs copy / paste. But to be fair to Markus there's no suggestion he's trying to pass this off as his own.

I think MM's blog is quality. Not just for the views (some of which I agree with, some I don't of course). I also think eh writes very well. If you read it regularly it has enough little in jokes and self deprecating humour to make it entertaining as well as often informative.

GJ
 
Martin has a point re links vs copy / paste. But to be fair to Markus there's no suggestion he's trying to pass this off as his own.

I think MM's blog is quality. Not just for the views (some of which I agree with, some I don't of course). I also think eh writes very well. If you read it regularly it has enough little in jokes and self deprecating humour to make it entertaining as well as often informative.

GJ
I wasn't suggesting that Markus was, not in the slightest. All I am saying is that there's a possibility of abuse by someone less scrupulous than Markus, which is why I have adopted the rule of never reading cut-and-paste'd material. Better be safe than rely on potentially contaminated information...

Completely agreed about MM. To me it's not just about the views and the analysis, but also the wit and the gentle humour. I admit to being very curious about his identity.
 
Makes sense guys.

I do always post links tho when putting sthg up here, and clearly mark quotes in bold.

But can just as easily only post links in future, no probs, and I do see how it could be a problem.

Just never thought of that I guess.
 
Completely agreed about MM. To me it's not just about the views and the analysis, but also the wit and the gentle humour. I admit to being very curious about his identity.


Never been seen in the same room as The Stig - I can tell you that much.
 
Personally, I would always prefer to read something that's linked rather than cut-and-paste'd. By the same token, I would like my content to be read in the original. Main reasons for this are the implicit possibilities for copyright infringement and violation of integrity of content. While I am sure you are not editing things and always credit the author (me), the possibility is always there, which is why I make it a rule to avoid anything that's been cut-and-paste'd.
 
OK, that's a pretty unanimous vote must say, so so be it.

One thing tho is sometimes you've still got to copy and paste because of the way blogs are set up, ie with blogs you can't link to specific articles, only to the blog itself.

But that apart, from now on if I find sthg I'll just post a link.

Honestly never thought about this at all.
 
OK, that's a pretty unanimous vote must say, so so be it.

One thing tho is sometimes you've still got to copy and paste because of the way blogs are set up, ie with blogs you can't link to specific articles, only to the blog itself.

But that apart, from now on if I find sthg I'll just post a link.

Honestly never thought about this at all.
Markus, for most of the blogs, if you click on the entry title (e.g. 'Consider Yourselves Warned' header in the latest Macro Man), it will actually take you to this specific entry and give you a link to it, like this: http://macro-man.blogspot.com/2009/07/consider-yourselves-warned_31.html Blogspot and others are quite clever this way.
 
Markus, for most of the blogs, if you click on the entry title (e.g. 'Consider Yourselves Warned' header in the latest Macro Man), it will actually take you to this specific entry and give you a link to it, like this: http://macro-man.blogspot.com/2009/07/consider-yourselves-warned_31.html Blogspot and others are quite clever this way.

Ah ok, crikey, as Rathcoole would say, that was pretty fick of me wasn't it not getting that.

:LOL:

Thanks for pointing that out Martin.
 
Top