
GJ, I suppose I'm just a big friend of KISS, of keeping it as simple as possible while still getting the desired results.
I think in a way that simple charting - or tape reading as say Livermore called it, only difference being ones depiction of price was numerical while mine is visual - has the advantage that it basically always has and always will work on a net profitable basis as long as there is sufficient movement in markets.
And, on top of that, it's an area where I think you don't have all that much competition, I'd presume that these days not all but definitely most hedge funds for example use some form of data mined correlations and computer driven models they base their trading on.
Another detriment down that road is that you'd be competing with them in an area where their success is already diminishing as too many of them are all doing the same thing largely, and at the same time, and in the same markets.
I think Renaissance Technologies, who definitely showed that mathematical computer driven models can be very successful, started a real catch-me-if-you-can race in the latest big thing, but as always too much competition offering the same gizmo is not good for business.
Finally, those people may exist, but on all these mechanical systems sites like wealthlab or tradestation etc etc, when I was starting out fishing for answers there, I have never seen or heard of a programmer who was able to get a programme to do the same very simple stuff I do visually on a chart...
It was always, well, patterns may
look easy, but easy to programme they are not.
So using simple price patterns that worked a hundred years ago and still work today
would seem to be an advantage I believe.
But then I must admit that it is years ago that I went looking for answers there.
Are you and your group mainly mining data for inter / intra market relationships etc and using mathematical models in your proprietary trading ?
Or do you also have people just doing basic charting ?