Re: Something wrong... Quote:
Originally Posted by donaldduke And this is supposed to be traders forum? |
Ha ha ha ha….you kidder you…. Quote:
Originally Posted by donaldduke The Casino owns the roulette table and it is trivial to show the
black or double black provides the casino with a mathematical edge and
so the casino is definitely not gambling. |
That would be an edge for sure. Most of the tables I’ve seen have the zero (and double zero) as a green. I’m guessing being colour blind doesn’t detract from the enjoyment. “Put it all on the purple”. Quote:
Originally Posted by donaldduke Now as a trader you are supposed to have an edge that exploits supply and demand imbalances in the market. |
Rather narrow definition of an edge, but OK, one potential area where opportunity can be assessed and acted upon. Quote:
Originally Posted by donaldduke You would also need to show your edge isn't about dodging big bullets (eg selling potentially explosive Options), that you were making lots of small trades.
Of course there is no guarantee your edge will continue,
and if it permanently breaks down and you continue to trade long after that point,
you are no longer the casino and you now just another gambler.
But even casinos will stop using roulette tables that might have developed a negative bias in them.
Basically if you have been long term profitable (over 100s or 1000s of small risk trades) you were not gambling. You might become a gambler in the future, but you can either stop or you can find another better strategy. And if you continue to be profitable you can continue to claim that you haven't been gambling.
And if you are profitable for long enough other people might actually accept you are not a gambling. |
DD, you of all people surprise me in that you seem to have got hung up on the quite pointless (IMHO) chase for a definition of gambler and trader.
The trader that loses his/her edge isn’t any more of a gambler than they were with an edge.
The punter (for what of a better term) who doesn’t trade the markets but does bet on sporting events having an edge of intelligent assessment of form, a network of contacts providing inside information and an understanding of basic probability, human nature and what’s “going on currently” in their sector of the industry, is no less a gambler on a winning streak than a losing one.
A consistently successful and intelligent gambler is no different in terms of what they do to a consistently successful and intelligent trader. They’re both working with the action to get a positive result base don what they know and how they use what they know. |