Who are the scammiest members of t2w?

arabianights

Legendary member
Messages
6,721
Likes
1,380
I'm starting this thread for lulz.

There are many members who claim to be good traders who blatantly aren't. Rather than myself going to the bother of naming them, I should be interested if anyone else wants to name them (or to confess) in the spirit of lulz.

P.S. anyone who names me is a gay
 
  • Like
Reactions: tar
Some people he got far too much time on their hands..............you win the prize for the most stupid thread, and there have been quite a few of them. Can't bvelieve I have weasted my time and energy posting a reply here but just had to.
 
Some people he got far too much time on their hands..............you win the prize for the most stupid thread, and there have been quite a few of them. Can't bvelieve I have weasted my time and energy posting a reply here but just had to.

I disagree with u , this thread is good , scam members should be exposed ...
 
You need to 'man up' Arabian, and start naming some names in the spirit of lulz.
 
cant be 100% as they would include me and arabian when we are infact, 100% genuine articles.
 
cant be 100% as they would include me and arabian when we are infact, 100% genuine articles.


But that's what everyone says.
I guess you just have to go with your instincts and base your opinions on peoples claims on that.
Im still thinking possibly 100%
 
Last edited:
OK, well to inject some objectivity into this thread we need? to objectively agree on the definition of "good trader" and take it from there ..

So what is this threads definition of "good trader" ? Or what should it be ?
 
Good traders are those who can trade other peoples money and make a profit, great traders are those who get the same results with their own.


Well that just popped into my head as traders in a firm may well have extra support managers / staff telling them what to do monitoring them and possibly applying external influence to aid / alter their decision/ actions etc. So they cannot begin to measure while they are amongst others ? Only when they are on their own can the test begin ?
 
OK, well to inject some objectivity into this thread we need? to objectively agree on the definition of "good trader" and take it from there ..

So what is this threads definition of "good trader" ? Or what should it be ?

I'd like to know what is meant by "scammiest".

Does that mean people who are scammers (i.e. trying to sell a fake product, or fake expertise) or what?

The OP spoke of people who claimed to be good traders and blatantly aren't, but that doesn't make them scammers; more like bull****ters. But actually, you could be a bull****ter and still be a good trader. The bull**** might be to put people off what you are really doing.

I mean some people come on here and spout a load of old dutch - take Arabian for example -) - but I know for a copper-bottomed fact that he is an ace trader (and also he said he was, so it must be true). Then there's that Norman Rockwell, no Rothskind....whatever.

What were we talking about ....?
 
It's scammy if you represent oneself as having competence in some way. That one doesn't benefit from the money lost by people taking ones advice is immaterial.

This is why I have my signature :)
 
Top