cyof post

Seen as the theorists, detractors, or Interferers as I like to call them, persist in their non sensical rubbish, I will continue to educate a little more, just for clarity.

What is Spiritual Ability?

Spiritual Ability is the same as Spiritual Activity

What is Spiritual Activity?

Thought is the only Spiritual Activity

So, this means, that by the application of the correct thinking process, as all thought is Spiritual Activity, the trader is able to achieve Trading Mastery

In order to SEE any results, as in the effect (consistent profits), the cause(Spiritual Ability or The Ability to Think Correctly when trading - hey, I remember a thread that sounded something like that, and guess what, T2W sent it to a place that says it has "absolutely nothing to do with trading", how appropriate ) must be applied under the same conditions.

Now, we do not try and hide anything, so we can not let anything slip, as you so put it

You see, we always speak the TRUTH

The TRUTH will always prevail - there is no other way - the Immutable Laws

So, continue to theorise, detract and Interfere as long as you like, but it will not, or can not, change anything.

Some day, some of you will realise this FACT of life, and when you do, you will say, hmm, maybe that fool Socrates, and that stupid Paddy, the one called CYOF, who keeps saying he knows absolutely nothing about anything, maybe they are right, and maybe, just maybe, if I start to use that little spongy mass that is stuck between my two ears I may actually accomplish something, and then, just maybe, I will actually do something, instead of just talking nothing but pure non sensical rubbish, that comes from nothing only Inspiration

Thank you jon for re-posting my deleted post.

I would prefer if you had placed it back in the Vanilla thread, where it was deleted from, but I am willing to accept the vote of the majority - so, if none vote to have it re-instated to where it was originally posted, that is fine with me, and if some want it put back from where it came, that is also fine with me.

Regards,

this post should not be reinserted it has nothing what so ever to do with the purpose of the thread which is to prove that option writers have the edge
A moderators decision has worked well in recent months I see no reason to start having votes on things now

If we're at the point where voting is the order of the day, then we have a problem.

As I've suggested more than once, moderation of these things is pointless as long as the standards are as vague and subjective as they are. CYOF is no more abusive than bertie is, yet bertie is given more or less free rein.

If people want to read this stuff and even participate in it, let them. What's the harm? If they don't want to read it, much less participate in it, then no harm is done there, either. The options thread may generate a lot of reports, but few people really give a damn about the content one way or the other.

Now, that sums you up all over again.

There you go, thinking for other people, again!

Whilst I may use slight words that may offend some at times, like monkeys, I do not use very rude and degrading words like GFY, whatever it really means, for we have not been told, and will probably never be told.

Mr Marcus is 100% correct.

Viewers should be given access to the views of all members, for the views of some, not too many mind you, for we all know that there will always be the 95%, may actually be of benefit to them.

But, the choice is their own, always has been - and always will be.

Do you notice that we never speak of censoring anyone, and I have never reported a bad post since I joined this site

I openly noted that Profitaker was allowed to continue with posting words like GFY, whilst my posts were been deleted for mentioning monkeys, or something even less trivial.

I was once a monkey, and I am not afraid to admit it, ever.

True knowledge comes for discussion - if discussion is censored, then the chances of tru knowledge for some, is also been censored.

Let the people speak, and as has been said by many members here, when I first joined this site, if the fire is too hot, then get out of the heat - the choice is yours, but remember, you do not make the choice for others, never, they make their own choice based on the information (all information) at hand

That said, who else do you think will vote to not have this post re-instated - for all know the usual names by now

is it relevant to the soap it was extracted from..yes
is it of any material benefit is a different question ..only if the alternative use of time was given over to studying the texture on your loo roll

Its amazing how one disagreement can bring about so many arguments. Why not agree to disagree, life really is too short!

Everyone agrees thinking for themselves and thinking in general is vital, so if 2 members believe that writers have an edge, so be it. Neither side is going to change its mind so get over it.

I take it that is a Yes - Chump