| |||||||
| |||||||
purchased trading systems dont work
This is a discussion on purchased trading systems dont work within the Mechanical & Systems Trading forums, part of the Styles & Strategies category; seems to be the general gyst of what people on this sectionof the forum are saying....in the med/long term at ...
![]() | ||||
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 33
| purchased trading systems dont work
seems to be the general gyst of what people on this sectionof the forum are saying....in the med/long term at least. but i'm guessing that some people here do have succesful mechanical trading systems, and i'm trying to build a fairly simple one myself. the question is to those of you who have developed a succesful system - what basics are your systems based on? did they need a great deal of programming, or nothing that couldnt be done in excel? do you have a level of drawdown before you decide the system is not working? any other info would be useful thanks in advace |
| |
| | #2 | |
| Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Melbourne, Victoria Posts: 684
| Quote:
2) Once you have your list of requirements, you can then develop ideas which potentially offer what you are looking for. I would suggest buying suitable software to backtest your ideas. If you intend to trade Equities, then make sure the software has "portfolio" / Monte Carlo backtesting facilities. 3) Make sure you have CLEAN and RELIABLE data on which to develop the system. Rely on free data at your peril !!!! 4) Understand BEFORE you begin this project (i) about the pro's & con's of mechanical systems in general , (ii) limitations of backtesting and maybe (iii) an basic appreciation for Stats. There are a number of very good books on the subject. Not understanding these areas will cause you problems downstream and may make the backtesting stage useless. 5) Don't worry about when to switch the system on & off at this stage. Focus instead on producing a system which (i) matches (or is very close to) your list of requirements and (ii) produces a positive expectancy. 6) Enjoy the Journey.......
__________________ A Fine is a Tax for doing something wrong. A Tax is a Fine for doing something right !! Return of Capital should always be more important than Return on Capital | |
| |
The post above is recommended by: trendie |
| | #3 |
| Rookie Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 14
|
I think it's also important to know what type of market conditions your systems was intended to trade in, and when the markets are not acting normally, you turn the system off until the markets return to conditions that the system was intended to work in. Probably the most important lesson I learned...http://www.trade2win.com/boards/imag...cheesygrin.gif |
| |
| | #4 |
| Member |
Chorlton has offered very good advice. As he implied, it is important to understand the trading system development process. This apparent step backward on your learning curve might seem counterproductive because resources will be diverted from researching trading strategies and to understanding a process; nonetheless, such diversion is necessary to properly build and trade automated systems.
__________________ Steve Last edited by Dacamic; Feb 18, 2009 at 2:35pm. Reason: Grammar |
| |
The post above is recommended by: zupcon |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member |
I've come to the conclusion that purchased systems don't work because there aren't really any on the market. Ignore auto pilot etc, obviously all cons. I once thought about selling some automated strategies, with full disclosure as to what they do etc, but it's not worth it. There aren't really many people who want a bot which makes 10% a month or whatever, willing to pay a fair price, only people chasing dreams they know aren't really going to come true. |
| |
| | #6 |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 51
|
if you has a formula to make money would you sell it? and you also have to consider market efficency. every 1 uses a formula that they have purchased, they will not have any advantage. |
| |
| | #7 | |
| Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Melbourne, Victoria Posts: 684
| Depends on whether you would trade it yourself... If I stumbled across a system during my own development which had a positive expectancy, etc, etc BUT it did not match my OWN list of requirements (inc my personalility) I may consider selling it. Quote:
__________________ A Fine is a Tax for doing something wrong. A Tax is a Fine for doing something right !! Return of Capital should always be more important than Return on Capital | |
| |
![]() |
« Backtesting & Optimization Workshop, London - March 09
|
Where to get EA written for my trading system »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IG Index java-based real-time financial charts won't work at work!! | MitchT | Internet/Network/Firewalls | 9 | Mar 24, 2009 8:36pm |
| Can mechanical forex systems work? | north5 | Forex Discussion | 220 | Jan 24, 2009 4:38pm |
| Whats the obsession with systems? Why dont more people pattern trade? | Rupert206 | General Trading Chat | 28 | Nov 7, 2008 1:13pm |
| Trading Systems that Work by THOMAS STRIDSMAN | dojistar | For Sale | 0 | Dec 1, 2007 9:11am |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Special Offers for T2W Members* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Free Trades in 30 Days | Free Special Report | Low Rates from $1.50/contract | | |
| * Offers open to new clients only. ** Just enter promotional code T2W100 when opening an account. T&Cs Apply. | ||||
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 6:06pm.
Copyright © 2001-2009 Trade2Win Ltd






The post above is recommended by:

