Renminbi revaluation

scose-no-doubt

Veteren member
Messages
4,630
Likes
954
Anyone got any news or links on the numbers. Ransquawk quite dead on the matter. Also anyone know where I can see futures charts of euro and usd crosses?
 
Better dollar term returns for chinese operations. Gonna have to take the hit on higher expenses though with the min wage rise but I doubt margins are thin. Could be good longer term. Also easier for Chinese companies to keep good $EPS.
I dunno how higher commods will effect US business though. Good for oil and banks I assume I'd think those sectors would support the index. If this has positive effect on US exports as I keep seeing everywhere then good numbers lead to more upticks in the US.
Depends on whether the money would prefer to be in china for the inflow of appreciating yields or stay in america.
I'm just watching to see if the HS and H shares start leading the Dow. Probably see what happens after (if) the gap closes.
No idea really I just wanted to see the forex lol.
 
Last edited:
China’s Renminbi Announcement: A Big Headfake

Naked Capitalism;

There are some real internal inconsistencies. While this does represent an announcement of an intent to liberalize, it lacks any particulars as to timing and mechanisms. Moreover, it specifically rejects the idea of widening the bands in which the RMB trades, which is the litmus test of a move to a market-based exchange rate (you’d expect gradual widening of the permitted band as a precursor to abandoning currency intervention).

Instead, what this appears to signal is a shift of the basis for managing the currency to:

1. Use of a basket of reference currencies, rather than just the dollar. China is contending that that is what it has been doing since 2005, but the language allows for the possibility for a change in the mix. Thus this signals China’s intent to move away from a dollar reserve currency regime (it has taken other measures along these lines, for instance, encouraging invoicing in currencies other than the dollar). The problem is that a permitted trading band vs. a basket of currencies is what China supposedly implemented in 2007, and the results have looked an awful lot like a dirty float against the dollar.

2. Arguing for the balance of payments as the metric of the appropriateness of the exchange rates. China contends that because its balance of payments is improving (as in its trade surplus is weakening) it really does not need to do much (as in it has ruled out a meaningful revaluation). This is essentially an argument that the large trade deficit for March means critics need to lay off, a posture it took in April. The problem, however, was the March deficit appears to have been the result of one-off factors. China’s exports in May were larger than expected, due to more robust export growth. And note Chinese officials had expected exports to rise 50% over 2009.

The fact is, as Michael Pettis pointed out in his latest post, no country in modern times has ever run a trade surplus as a percent of GDP as large as China does. That means even if it does decide to extricate itself from this position, it will want to do so gradually. As Pettis noted:

As a share of global GDP China’s recent trade surpluses (roughly 0.6-0.7% of global GDP) are easily the highest recorded in the last 100 years.

This is all the more striking when you consider that the two previous record holders, the US in the late 1920s (with a trade surplus equal roughly to 0.4% of global GDP) and Japan in the late 1980s (0.5% of global GDP), were relatively much larger economies. The US represented more than 30% of global GDP in the late 1920s, and Japan represented 15% of global GDP in the late 1980s. By contrast China represents only 8% of global GDP today.

In the same post, he also rejected the idea that China’s trade balance is moderating:

In other words the cost of capital for China’s already too-capital-intensive and overinvesting economy is declining, and so worsening the domestic imbalances, and all but assuring that China’s trade surplus excluding Europe will surge (and maybe even including Europe it will still rise). In fact one of the least surprising of the “surprises” of recent months was China’s May trade figures. Here is what an article on Thursday in the South China Morning Post says:

Mainland’s exports rose 48.5 per cent in May from a year earlier and imports were up 48.3 per cent, the General Administration of Customs said on Thursday, giving the country a trade surplus of US$19.53 billion, up from just US$1.7 billion in April. The median forecast of 32 economists polled by Reuters was for exports to rise 32 per cent and imports to climb 45 per cent, with a projected trade surplus of US$8.8 billion.

Sources said on Wednesday that export growth was up about 50 per cent from a year ago, giving a boost to global financial markets as investors expressed relief that the country’s fast growing economy did not appear to be juddering to a sharp halt.

Some surprise, although I should add that I have a worrying feeling that the subsequent applause by the global stock markets may have got it exactly backwards. Net exports had to surge after the temporary contraction earlier this year, and in fact if you exclude the impact of commodity stockpiling, which overstates outflows due to consumption imports and understates outflows due to investment, China’s trade surplus would have probably been much higher. It is being artificially reduced by commodity stockpiling, which of course must be reversed at some point in the future. I expect that Chinese net exports will continue very strong this year, perhaps even taking into account the effect of the European crisis, which should be excluded from the number. And of course I expect US net imports, and with it US unemployment, will surge to politically unacceptable levels throughout this year and next, thanks in large part the European crisis and the unwillingness of anyone else to absorb it.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/06/is-chinas-renminbi-announcement-mainly-optics.html
 
I said I think it could be good for stocks in the longer term and I meant if implemented as policy and it was a serious reval. I also said I'd be short at the moment for the gap. You'd better close out.
 
21 Jun 2010 - 14:41
NEW YORK, June 21 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks rose at the open on Monday as China's vow to allow a flexible yuan invigorated optimism in the global recovery and raised the outlook for sales in the long term at U.S. multinationals.

I'm gonna start charging you people soon.
 
Its on the rise but not as sharply as expected compared to other markets... Took at tumble at 10520 for a retrace. Maybe people realise that the yuan being free is not a short term gain... News was already absorbed into the US markets by the time they opened IMO.
 
Roubini had some quality comments over the weekend re. keeping it in your trousers as this is not nec. *good news*..can't be bothered digging it out...that naked capitalism link is worth looking at.
 
Top