<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Trade2Win Forums - Planning, Risk & Money Management]]></title>
		<link>http://www.trade2win.com/boards/</link>
		<description>Take control with stop and limit orders, and knowing your risk/reward.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:34:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Drawdown simulation and trading systems selection</title>
			<link>http://www.trade2win.com/boards/planning-risk-money-management/79870-drawdown-simulation-trading-systems-selection.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:02:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Method 
Suppose i have a trading system A which has historical 100 trades data. I ran simulation 10,000 trials and look at the worst drawdown that this system A could have produced by chance alone. Let's say that  
 
System A has max simulated Drawdown (DD) at -40%. Now if I set my maximum drawdown...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Method<br />
Suppose i have a trading system A which has historical 100 trades data. I ran simulation 10,000 trials and look at the worst drawdown that this system A could have produced by chance alone. Let's say that <br />
<br />
System A has max simulated Drawdown (DD) at -40%. Now if I set my maximum drawdown of my portfolio at -20%, i will be trading system A by only half of my portfolio to ensure that when the worst comes, i <br />
<br />
won't be down more than -20%. By the same token, if system B has max simulated DD of -10%, i will be trading 200% of my portfolio on system B.<br />
<br />
Questions:<br />
Currently I set every system that i have equally at -20% max portfolio DD. Here's what i mean<br />
<br />
System/		Max Simulated DD/		Portfolio Max allowable DD/		Market exposure adjustment %	/	Annual Expected Returns (100% market exposure)<br />
A		-30%				-20%				70%					36%<br />
B		-63%				-20%				33%					24%<br />
<br />
For example, if i have $100,000 portfolio, i will trade system A at 70,000 market exposue in a given trade. And i will trade only $33,000 worth of market exposure on system B. This also mean that my expected <br />
<br />
returns will be geared down accordingly. So system A will now have expected returns to my portfolio of (36%*70%) = 25.2%. And system B will give me 7.9% returns to my portfolio.<br />
<br />
Now here's my question, by setting each system max DD to -20% of the total portfolio, i am willingly allow each system an equal chance of damaging my portfolio. You would ask, why should i allow system B <br />
<br />
which can generate only 7.9% returns to my total portfolio to have the same damaging effect on my portfolio. In other words, should i set B at -15% instead of -20%? How about setting A at -25%? What should <br />
<br />
be my method in setting this Portfolio Maximum Allowable DD when i take into consideration the expected returns of each system?<br />
<br />
Any comment is welcome.<br />
<br />
Thank you</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.trade2win.com/boards/planning-risk-money-management/"><![CDATA[Planning, Risk & Money Management]]></category>
			<dc:creator>palm</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.trade2win.com/boards/planning-risk-money-management/79870-drawdown-simulation-trading-systems-selection.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
