Turning Standard Deviation Bands into Overbought/Oversold Indicator


18 ratings



David Sepiashvili

05 Dec, 2005

in Technical Analysis

Limitations in usefulness of conventional standard deviation bands as overbought/oversold benchmarks

One of the popular ways of detecting a trend in financial market time series corrupted by random fluctuations (noise) is moving average smoothing. Actual prices fluctuate around the moving average. To measure an average distance of price values from the moving average the standard deviation (SD) can be used. The so-called in statistics “range rule of thumb” determines the range of price variability around the moving average as approximately 4SD, providing confidence limit of about 95.5 %. According to the rule, the upper boundary of the range will be about 2SD above the moving average and the lower boundary of the range will be about 2SD below the moving average. In order to get higher confidence of the projected range, its half-bandwidth should be widened, for example to 3SD. The probability that the price data will be within plus or minus three standard deviations from moving average is equal in this case to 99.7%. As you can see from above, the primary function of the conventional standard deviation bands is to estimate the range of price variability around the moving average and indicate the current disposition of the price in relation to the moving average and the bands. The commonly used for this purpose 2SD bands are known in technical analysis as Bollinger Bands. Mr. Bollinger recommends using a 20-point period simple moving average of typical price for their calculation.

Can Bollinger Bands be used as overbought/oversold benchmarks? Some traders believe that Bollinger Bands offer an effective tool for indicating overbought/oversold conditions and oncoming reversals in a trend. And many traders criticize them for not providing more straightforward readings of price extremes. The thing is that when price is losing momentum it deviates from the bands in advance, much before it reaches the extremities. That is why when prices hit the upper or lower boundaries of the bands this it is not necessarily an indication of their extremes. It just means that prices have reached the limits of the established range. That’s why traders would have to use other indicators in conjunction with these price bands to determine the overbought/oversold conditions and the reversal points of the trend. The same limitation refers to the derivative indicators, such as the “%b” indicator, and CCT Bollinger Bands Oscillator provided by Steve Karnish.
In this article, we will show how to make standard deviation bands adequately fulfill a function of providing overbought/oversold benchmarks.

Quantitative criterion of functioning

To trade successfully the benchmarks of overbought/oversold indicators must be set so that most of valid signals could penetrate them providing a reliable indication of the security’s overbought/oversold conditions. Our study of the problem shows that about 60% of all signals generated by any trading rule, for example by price and moving average crossover rule, must penetrate overbought/oversold benchmarks, and 40 % of the signals, which are supposed be false reversals typical for congestion and transition phases, must be rejected. For ranging and weakly trending markets (Dow retracement > 0.5) about 20% to 30% of the points falling outside the benchmarks meet this criterion, providing reliable readings of a security’s overbought/oversold conditions. This proportion must therefore be attributed to the standard deviation bands to turn them into the overbought/oversold benchmarks. It was found that the required proportion is provided by the half-bandwidth of the bands equal to 1.4 SD. That is, the upper boundary of the bands will be about 1.4 SD above the moving average, and the lower boundary of the bands will be about 1.4 SD below the moving average.

Dual representation of the indicator

The 1.4-standard deviation price bands as overbought/oversold indicator can be easily reconfigured into an oscillator format. The indicator in this format consists of the conventional price oscillator calculated as difference between price and its moving average, and 1.4 SD overbought and oversold boundaries plotted above and below zero line. The oscillator fluctuates around the zero line and inside and outside the 1.4 SD boundaries. Penetration of the upper boundary indicates overbought conditions, while penetration of the lower boundary signifies oversold conditions. By way of illustration see in Figure 1 of DJ Industrial Index the 10-day period indicator, and in Figure 2 of DJ Transportation Index the 40-day period indicator, both in price chart and oscillator formats. The offered oscillator determines not only overbought/oversold conditions but also defines volatility. You can see how harmonically the overbought/oversold bands contract during less volatile periods, and how the bands expand during more volatile periods. Low readings of volatility, typically preceding a large move in the security’s price, clearly indicate congestion and transition zones, which better be skipped.

You need to be logged in to post comments or rate this article.

Hurst Channel - Hurst Band

I need to scan stocks for those moved above Upper Hurst Band and those moved below Lower Hurst Band.

Could you please recommend software that can automatically scan stocks and pick the right ones?

Dec 05, 2006

Member (6 posts)

Two points if I may

1 if using MAs and their derivatives to make statistical decisions, surely the MAs should be plotted half their distance back. eg a 9 day MA value would be plotted against day 5 data? This will alter the timing of boundary "hits"

2. A simpler approach to this issue has been shown by J M Hurst in his book "The profit magic of stock transaction timing" where he developed envelope analysis. It's one of my trading "bibles"

regards, G McA

Dec 11, 2005

Member (117 posts)

David, Thank you for an interesting article. You have certainly given your concept considerable thought. Im trying to test your conclusions using excel. However clarification is needed. You mentioned your price oscilator is calculated between the price and the M.A. Normally it is calculated using the difference of two MAs? Secondly is the S.D. calculated from the actual price of the product or the M.A.. Hope you can help. Thanks
P.S. I want to try it on FX. If I get the same results I will let you know.

Dec 09, 2005

Member (123 posts)